期刊文献+

论数字馆藏评价指标的获取方法 被引量:10

Method of Accessing to Evaluation Indicators of Digital Collections
原文传递
导出
摘要 介绍数字馆藏评价的含义、内容和国外对数字馆藏评价的相关研究情况,在分析数字馆藏评价内容的基础上,将评价指标科学地分为定量指标、定性指标和半定量指标三大类。论述每类评价指标的获取方法,指出定量指标有三种获取方法,定性指标有两种获取方法,半定量指标则可通过调查问卷、统计及分析来获取。 Evaluation of digital collections is not only related to the scientific evaluation system and methods, but also to evaluation indicators, which play a very important role in influencing the result of evaluations. From the evaluation contents of digital collections, the paper classifies the evaluation indicators into qualitative, quantitative and semi-quantitative groups. For quantitative indicators three ways are often used, while for the qualitative there are only two ways. In order to obtain the semi-quantitative indicators, surveys for statistics and analyses are usually carried out.
出处 《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第4期60-63,共4页 Library and Information Service
基金 国家社科基金"数字馆藏质量评价与绩效分析"(04BTQ001)
关键词 数字馆藏 馆藏评价 评价指标 指标获取 digital collection collection evaluation evaluation indicator access to indicator
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1张咏.网络信息资源评价的方法及指标.[2003—07—11].http://www.chinalibs.net. 被引量:1
  • 2盛小平.数字图书馆馆藏评价[J].图书情报工作,2003,47(5):40-43. 被引量:72
  • 3肖希明.网络环境下的馆藏评价标准[J].中国图书馆学报,2002,28(5):21-24. 被引量:105
  • 4ISO. Information and Documentation-International Library Statistics.In : ISO27892003 (E). Switzerland, ISO27892003 ( E ) :35 - 43. 被引量:1
  • 5Poll R. Performance measures for library networked services and resources. The Electronic Library,2001,19(5) :307 - 314. 被引量:1
  • 6Blixrud J C. Measures for electronic use:The ARL E-Metric Project.[2004- 03 -01 ]. http://www. arl. org/stats/newmeas/emetrics/index. html. 被引量:1
  • 7EQUINOX library performance measurement and quality management system performance indicators for electronic library services. [ 2004- 09 - 15 ]. http ://equinox. dcu. ie/reports/pilist. html. 被引量:1
  • 8刘雁书,方平.网络信息质量评价指标体系及可获取性研究[J].情报杂志,2002,21(6):10-12. 被引量:48
  • 9胡昌平著..信息管理科学导论[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2001:425.
  • 10[ 2004 -08 - 18 ]. http ://ultra2. lib. tsinghua. edu. cn/cpx/plsql/cust_ usage. usage_by_month. 被引量:1

二级参考文献27

  • 1[1]Beredjiklian PK,Bozentka DJ,Steinberg DR,et al.Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedie information on the Internet.The case of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.J Bone Joint Surg Am,2000,82-A(11) 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Ambre J,Guard R,Perveiler FM et al.Working draft white paper:criteria for assessing the quality of health information on the Internet.http://www.metretek.org /hiti/show-case/documents/criteria.html last updated,1999.4.8 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Suares-Almazor ME,Kendall CJ,Dorgan M.Surfing the Net-information on the World Wide Web for persons with arthritis:patient empowerment or patient deceit? J Rheumatol,2001,28 被引量:1
  • 4[4]Gardois P.Evaluating the quality of medical information on the Internet:a brief bibliography.8 ICML Conference Proceedings.Available from:http://www.icml.org/posters/post28.html.Last edited,2000.09.06 被引量:1
  • 5[5]American Medical Association.Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the Internet Principles governing AMA Web sites American Medical Association.JAMA,2000,283(12) 被引量:1
  • 6[6]Growth House Inc.Rating Criteria and excellence awards.http:/www.growthhouse,org/award.html Last visited:2001.4.17 被引量:1
  • 7[7]Searchenginewatch.com.Search Engine Placement Tips.http://www.searchenginewatch.com/webmasters/tips.html Last visited:2000.4.30 被引量:1
  • 8[8]Kim P,Eng TR,Peering JM,et al.Published criteria for evaluating health related Web sites.BMJ,1999,1318(7184) 被引量:1
  • 9[9]Kihlstrom LC.Evaluating pharmacy benefit management information on the Interet:Purpose,Structure,technology,and content.Manag care Interface.2001,14(5) 被引量:1
  • 10[10]Harris R.Evaluating Internet research sources.http://www.virtualsalt.com/8evaluit.html Revised date 1997.11.17.Last Visited.2001.4.4 被引量:1

共引文献204

同被引文献117

引证文献10

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部