期刊文献+

行动推理中循环因果关系的研究 被引量:1

Cyclic Causality in Reasoning about Action
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来行动推理的研究成为人工智能领域的热门问题,而结果问题是目前行动推理研究的核心问题之一.该文针对许多行动推理系统不能处理循环因果关系的问题,提出了解决方法.基于适当修改后的McCain和Turner的因果理论,该文提出了一种能处理循环依赖的理论转化方法.转化后的因果理论消除了循环依赖,而且可以采用单调推理方法.基于因果闭包语义,证明了转化前后的因果理论具有相同的模型.当因果关系不存在循环依赖时,该文方法得到与McCain,Turner方法(1997)相同的结果. Intelligent behaviors of humans require the ability to predict the result of actions. McCarthy holds the view that reasoning about action plays an essential role in commonsense reasoning. In recent years, reasoning about action is a popular issue in AI domain and becomes a discussion subject in IJCAI for several years. Ramification problem is currently one of the central problems is reasoning about action. This paper describes some background and the main task of reasoning about action, recapitulates the ramification problem and points out the difficulty in it. Most of the current methods of reasoning about action cannot handle cyclic causal relation. This paper presents a solution to this problem. Firstly, based on modified causal theory of McCain and Turner, it puts forward an automatable procedure that transforms a syntactically restricted causal theory into a monotonic one without cyclic causality. Next, it proves the correctness of the procedure under causal closure semantic by showing that an interpretation is the model of the transformed theory if and only if it is the model of original theory. This paper also proves that the method yields the same results as that of McCain and Turner (1997) when the theory is stratified.
出处 《计算机学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2005年第5期829-837,共9页 Chinese Journal of Computers
基金 国家自然科学基金(60003010) 江苏省自然科学资金(BK2004079)资助.~~
关键词 因果关系 结果问题 行动推理 非单调推理 规划 因果理论 Inference engines Intelligent agents Knowledge representation Mathematical models Mathematical transformations Planning Semantics Theorem proving
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1McCarthy J., Hayes P.. Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In: Melter B., Michie D. eds.. Machine Intelligence, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1969, 4: 463~502 被引量:1
  • 2Lin Fang-Zhen. Embracing causality in specifying the indirect effects of actions. In: Proceedings of IJCAI95, Motreal, 1995, 1985~1991 被引量:1
  • 3Turner Hudson. A logic of universal causation. Artificial Intelligence, 1999, 113(1/2): 87~123 被引量:1
  • 4McIlraith S.. Integrating actions and state constraints: A closed-form solution to the ramification problem (sometimes). Artificial Intelligence, 2000, 116(1/2): 87~121 被引量:1
  • 5Giordano L., Martelli A., Schwind C.. Reasoning about actions in dynamic linear time temporal logic. Logic Journal of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logics (IGPL), 2001, 9(3): 79~92 被引量:1
  • 6Schubert L.K.. Monotonic solution of the frame problem in the situation calculus: An efficient method for worlds with fully specified actions. In: Kybury H.E. et al. eds.. Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning. Kluwer Academic Press, 1990, 23~67 被引量:1
  • 7Reiter R.. Knowledge in Action: Logical Foundations for Specifying and Implementing Dynamical Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001, 89~112 被引量:1
  • 8McCain N., Turner H.. Satisfiability planning with causal theories. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning(KR'98), Trento, 1998, 212~223 被引量:1
  • 9Shoham Y.. Nonmonotonic reasoning and causation. Cognitive Science, 1990, 14(1): 129~148 被引量:1
  • 10Denecker M., Dupré D.T., van Bellghem K.. An inductive approach to ramifications. Linkoping Electronic Articles in Computer and Information Science, 1998, 3(7): 121~145 被引量:1

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部