摘要
邓球柏老师将简本《老子》甲组第一章训为“继智弃偏,民利百倍;继巧弃利,盗贼亡有;继仁弃诈,民复季子”,不妥。简本仍应训为“绝”;训为“继”不符合老子思想特点。研究新出土的史料要坚持“两重新证法”。
Mr Deng Qiubai interprets the first chapter of the first scries of the Bamboo Slips Laozi as 'Carry on wisdom and eject prejudice, and the people will be more benefited a hundred times. Carry on artifice and eject gains, and there will be no robbers and thieves. Carry on benevolence and eject fraudulence, and the people will be like babies.' This is not appropriate. The character (?) on the bamboo slips is still 'do away with', and interpreting it as 'carry on' doesn't accord with the characteristic of Laozi' thought. Studying the new historical materials, we still should uphold the Principle of' Double Confirming'.
出处
《阜阳师范学院学报（社会科学版）》
2005年第2期79-80,共2页
Journal of Fuyang Normal University：Social Science Edition
关键词
继
绝
简本
老子
carry on
do away with
bamboo slips
Laozi
