期刊文献+

梁漱溟文化模式论及新儒学的现意义 被引量:1

Modern Meaning of Liang Shuming's Cultural Theory and New Confucianism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 北京大学的特殊文化环境,西方批判、反省现代化的思潮,父亲之死给梁漱溟带来的心理动力和毅力,是梁漱溟实现由佛返儒的文化心路的原因。梁漱溟提出的力图解决文化与现实社会存弊相连问题的文化模式有独创性,它为新儒学在当今的活跃开了一代风气,并赋予了儒学为核心的中国传统文化在现代社会中的世界意义。 The cultural environment typical of Beijing University,the critical attitude towards the West,the psychological motivation resulting from his father's death,all these reasons changed the cultural mind of Liang Shuming.The cultural pattern that he advanced to try to solve the problems involving the interconnection of culture and reality is creative and original.It laid the foundation for the reactivity of new Confucianism,and bestowed the Chinese culture with new Confucianism as its core with worldly status.
作者 杨必仪
出处 《汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 2005年第2期39-43,共5页 Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 梁漱溟 文化心路 文化模式 新儒学 现代意义 Liang Shuming cultural mind cultural pattern new Confucianism modern meaning
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献28

  • 1杨伯峻.论语译注[M].北京:中华书局出版社,1980.. 被引量:1877
  • 2成中英.当代中国哲学[M].美国:Black wells公司,2002. 被引量:1
  • 3ANTONIO S. CUA, 1985. Ethical Argumentation: A Study of Hsun Tsu's Epistemology. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. 被引量:1
  • 4JOHN KNOBLOCK,1988. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete works.Vol.Ⅰ, books1-6;Vol.Ⅱ, Books7-16. Stanford: Stanford University Press.T.H.Barrett, 1992. Li Ao: Buddhist, Taoist, or Neo-Confucian? Oxford: Oxford University Press. 被引量:1
  • 5PETER K. BOL, 1992. "This Culture of Ours": Intellectual Transition in T'ang and Sung China. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 被引量:1
  • 6MARTINA DEUCHLER, 1992. The Confucian Transfom?tion of Korea: A Study of Society and Ideology. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 被引量:1
  • 7JERRY DENNERLIN, 1981. The Chin-ting Loyalists: Confucian Leadership and Social Change in Seventeenth Century China. New Havean: Yale University Press. 被引量:1
  • 8CHARLES HARTMAN, 1986. Han Yu and the T'ang Search for Unity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 被引量:1
  • 9MASAO MARUYAMA, 1974. Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan. Trans. By Mikiso Hane. Princeton and Tokyo: Princeton University Press and University of Tokyo Press. 被引量:1
  • 10HOYT CLEVELAND TILLMAN, 1992a. A New Direction in Confucian Scholarship: Approaches to Examing the Differences between Neo-Confu-cianism and Tao-hsueh. Philosophy East and West 42, no. 3(July 1992): 455-74. 被引量:1

共引文献25

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部