期刊文献+

胸腹水中癌胚抗原和LDH及Glu水平的临床鉴别诊断价值 被引量:2

Clinical differential diagnostic value of CEA, LDH and Glu levels in benign and malignant hydrothorax and hydroperiotoneum
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨癌胚抗原(CEA)和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)及葡萄糖(Glu)水平在良恶性胸腹水中的临床鉴别诊断意义。方法分别采用化学发光标记免疫法、速率法和葡萄糖氧化酶法检测105例患者不同性质胸腹水中CEA和LDH及Glu的浓度,检测结果采用方差分析和Dunett’C法进行统计分析。结果恶性肿瘤组患者胸腹水标本中CEA值较结核性胸膜炎组和慢性非特异性炎症组明显升高(P<0.05);恶性肿瘤组和结核性胸膜炎组标本LDH值之间差异无显著性(P>0.05),但均高于慢性非特异性炎症组(P<0.05);恶性肿瘤组和慢性非特异性炎症组标本Glu值差异无显著性(P>0.05),但均高于结核性胸膜炎组(P<0.05)。结论联合定量检测CEA和LDH及Glu对胸腹水性质的鉴别诊断有重要临床参考价值。 Objective To explore the clinical differential diagnostic significance of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), lactate dehyrogenase (LDH) and glucose (Glu) in benign and malignant hydrothorax and hydroperiotoneum. Methods Chemilumiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA), velocity and glucose oxidase peroxidase (GOD-POD) method were used to determine the concentrations of CEA, LDH and Glu in the hydrothorax and hydroperiotoneum samples with different quality from 105 patients, respectively. The results were statistically analyzed by variance analysis and Dunett'C method. Results CEA values in the samples from patients with malignant tumor was remarkably increased compared with those of patients with tuberculous or chronic nonspecific inflammation(P<0.05). The LDH values in the samples from the malignant tumor patients and the tuberculous pleuritis did not show statistical difference(P>0.05), but higher than that from the chronic nonspecific inflammation(P<0.05). The Glu values in the samples from the malignant tumor patients and the chronic nonspecific inflammation patients were similar (P>0.05), but higher than that from the tuberculous pleuritis patients (P<0.05). Conclusion Quantitative co-detection of CEA, LDH and Glu can show important clinical reference value in differential diagnosis of hydrothorax and hydroperiotoneum quantity.
出处 《江西医学检验》 2005年第2期105-106,110,共3页 Jiangxi Journal of Medical Laboratory Sciences
基金 褚美芬 1965年生 大学本科 从事医学检验及相关研究。
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1丛玉隆.体液学检查进展[J].中华医学检验杂志,1999,22(4):246-250. 被引量:29
  • 2柏方刚,于登程.三项肿瘤标志物联检对胸腔积液的鉴别诊断价值[J].江西医学检验,2003,21(6):505-505. 被引量:5
  • 3Athanassiadou P, Gonidi M, Liossi A, et al. Moc-31, fibronectin and CEA in the differential diagnosis of malignants: An immunocytochemical study[J]. Pathol Oncol Res, 2000,6(2):100~103. 被引量:1
  • 4Queiroz C, Barral-Netto M, Bacchi CE. Characterizing subpopulations of neoplastic cells in serous effusions: The role of immunocytochemistry[J]. Acta Cytol, 2001, 45(1):18~22. 被引量:1
  • 5Gulyas M, Kaposi AD, Elek G. Value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cholesterol assays of ascitic fluid in cases of inconclusive cytology[J]. J Clin Pathol, 2001, 54(11):831~835. 被引量:1
  • 6Riantawan P, Sangsayan P, Bangpattanasiri K, et al. Limited additive value of pleural fluid carcineombryonic antigen level in malignant plearal effusion[J]. Respiration, 2000, 67(1):24~29. 被引量:1
  • 7Ryu JS, Lee HJ. The implication of elevated carcinoembryonic antigen level in pleural fluid of patients with non-malignant pleural effusion[J]. Respirology, 2003, 8(4):487~491. 被引量:1
  • 8伍华东 陈土良.联合检测胸腹水中CEA、FER、LDH的临床意义[J].中国实验诊断学,2000,6(4):294-294. 被引量:1
  • 9宋建芳 黄晓华.胸腹水腺苷脱氨酶及乳酸脱氢酶联合检测的意义[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2000,9(1):14-14. 被引量:2
  • 10Nusair S, Breuer R, Amir G. Closed pleural needle biopsy: predicting diagnostic yield by examining pleural fluid parameters[J]. Respir Med, 2002, 96(11):890~894. 被引量:1

二级参考文献4

  • 1黄宇峰,男科学报,1998年,4卷,7页 被引量:1
  • 2丛玉隆,临床 ,1998年,145页 被引量:1
  • 3丛玉隆,今日临床检验学,1997年,304页 被引量:1
  • 4中华人民共和国卫生部医政司,全国临床检验操作规程(第2版),1997年,145页 被引量:1

共引文献31

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部