摘要
苏轼以文为诗、以学为诗,自后山、易安以还,学界多有论述。但对其以文论诗、以学论诗的批评方法,却少有涉及。苏轼以文、学为批评,显然是出于他一贯的以文、学为诗的学术思维习惯和学术背景。他的以文、学为批评,集中体现在其对杜诗“诗史”品格批评上。
There have been many studies on Su Shi’s merging essays into poetry and merging knowledge into poetry after Chen Shidao and Li Qingzhao, while little attention to his taking essays’ and research’s criterion as critic’s principle, and which was just resulted from his constantly learning practice and background. It manifested on Su’s critic on Du Fu’s poetry, which was named Poetry with Historic Significance.
出处
《重庆三峡学院学报》
2005年第2期64-67,共4页
Journal of Chongqing Three Gorges University
关键词
苏轼
以文论诗
以学论诗
杜诗“诗史”批评
Su Shi
take essays as poetry
take knowledge as poetry
Du Fu’s Poetry’s history criticism
