期刊文献+

应用PAR指数评价不同拔牙方式矫治后牙关系的改善效果 被引量:8

Application of peer assessment rating index in the evaluation of occlusal outcome in orthodontic therapy with different tooth extraction pattern
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:了解不同拔牙方式正畸患者的治疗结果,为今后确立准确有效的拔牙选择和治疗标准提供临床指导和科学依据。方法:分别对 224例治疗前后模型进行PAR指数各项指标测量评分,评估治疗结果,对比不同拔牙方式疗效。结果: 224 例样本治疗后PAR总分值平均减少 20. 37±7. 99,减少百分率为74. 31±13. 63,非典型拔牙组治疗后PAR分值减少量和减少率高于不拔牙组(P<0. 05),取得了更多的牙合变化量。结论: 所选样本治疗改善效果明显,非典型拔牙组取得了较不拔牙组更明显的治疗效果。 Objective:To study treatment outcome with different tooth extraction pattern in orthodontic therapy. Methods:Extraction of 4 first premolars was conducted in 96 cases (group 1),that of 4 second premolors in 14(group 2),atypical extraction in 42 (group 3) and no extraction in 72 (group 4).Then orthodontic treatment was performed.Peer assessment rating(PAR) index was applied on pre- and post-orthodontic treatment dental casts for all the 224 patients.The treatment outcome was analysed by the reduction PAR score. Results:After treatment the mean PAR score reduction of all the cases was 20.37±7.99, the percentage reduction was 74.31±13.63.In group 1,2,3 and 4,the percentage reduction of PAR after treatment was 73.73±15.21,78.09±10.51,77.63± 12.62 and 72.40±12.20 respectively.Conclusion:Treatment with symmetrical and atypical extraction pattern may result in better treatment outcome than that with non-extraction pattern.
出处 《实用口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第2期259-261,共3页 Journal of Practical Stomatology
关键词 PAR指数 拔牙方式 治疗结果 PAR index Extraction pattern Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Richmond S,Shaw WC,Stephens CD,et al.Orthodontics in the General Dental Service of England and Wales:A critical assessment of standards.Br Dent J,1993,174(9):315. 被引量:1
  • 2Richmond S,Andrews H.Orthodontic treatment standards in Norway.Eur J Orthod,1993,15(1): 7. 被引量:1
  • 3Richmond S,Andrews M,Roberts CT.The provision of orthodontic care in the General Dental Service of England and Wales:Extraction patterns,treatment duration,appliance type and standards.Br J Orthod,1993,20(4): 345. 被引量:1
  • 4Taylor PJS,Kerr WJS,McColl JH.Factors associated with the standard and duration of orthdontic treatment.Br J Orthod,1996,23(4): 335. 被引量:1
  • 5缪耀强,施熙嘉,刘从华.应用PAR指数对332例错畸形矫治结果的评估[J].口腔正畸学,2001,8(1):9-12. 被引量:13
  • 6Holman JK,Hans MG,Nelson S,et al.An assessment of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment using the peer assessment rating (PAR) index.Angle Orthod,1998,68(6): 527. 被引量:1
  • 7Birkeland K,Furevik J,Boe OE,et al.Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index.Eur J Orthod,1997,19(3): 279. 被引量:1

二级参考文献8

  • 1Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT etal. The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): Methods to determine outcome of orthodontictreatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 1992,14:180-187. 被引量:1
  • 2Stricker G. Psychological issues pertaining to malocclusion. Am JOrthod1970,58:276-283. 被引量:1
  • 3徐宝华(主编).现代临床口腔正畸学.第1版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1996:272-273. 被引量:1
  • 4O'Brien KD, Shaw WC, Roberts CT. The use of occlusal indices in assessing theprovision of orthodontic treatment by the hospital orthodontic service of England andWales. Br J Orthod 1993,20:25-35. 被引量:1
  • 5Fox NA. The first 100 cases: personal audit of orthodontic treatment assessed bythe PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) index. Br Dent J 1993,174:290-297. 被引量:1
  • 6Buchanan IB, Russell JI, Clark JD. Practical application of the PAR in dex: anillustrative comparison of the outcome of treatment using two fixed appliance techniques.Br J Orthod 1996,23:351-357. 被引量:1
  • 7Birkeland K, Furevik J, Boe OE et al. Evaluation of treatment and posttreatmentchanges by the PAR index. Bur J Orthod 1997,19:279-288. 被引量:1
  • 8缪耀强,莫如昌,王传贵,刘从华.PAR指数在评估矫治结果中的临床应用[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,1998,14(4):16-18. 被引量:23

共引文献12

同被引文献67

引证文献8

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部