摘要
“犯意诱发型”的诱惑侦查不仅违反了侦查机关的职责 ,而且侵犯了公民的合法权益。为了抑制侦查权力的恶性膨胀 ,保护被告人的合法权益 ,在诉讼中应当允许被告人提出“陷阱抗辩” ,并且在举证时实行举证责任倒置 ,由被告人就陷阱抗辩的主张进行举证 ,如果举证不能 ,应追究被告人的刑事责任。反之 ,如果被告人能够提供充分证据证明其犯罪意图是侦查人员通过积极主动的行为引诱产生的 。
Investigation by entrapment not only violates the official duty of the investigative organ, but also infringes on the citizen's legitimate rights and interests. In order to control the vicious expansion of the power of investigation, and protect the accused's legitimate rights and interests, we should permit the accused to do entrapment defense; meanwhile it's the accused's obligation to provide evidence. If the accused can provide enough evidence against the police, the court will pronounce him not guilty. If not, the accused will be investigated into the criminal responsibility.
出处
《北京人民警察学院学报》
2005年第2期12-14,共3页
Journal of Beijing People‘s Police College
关键词
诱惑侦查
“犯意诱发型”
陷阱抗辩
举证责任
责任分配
criminal investigation by encouragement
entrapment
entrapment defense
the inversion of onus of proof
