摘要
目的:观察挑针疗法治疗颈椎病的疗效。方法:将158例颈椎病患者随机分为3组。挑针治疗组 56例,采用挑针疗法治疗;局麻对照组47例,采用利多卡因皮下注射治疗;针刺对照组55例,采用常规针 刺治疗。结果:挑针治疗组与局麻对照组、针刺对照组疗效比较,差异均有显著性意义(P<0.05);针刺对照 组与局麻对照组疗效比较,差异也有显著性意义(P<0.05)。证属气滞血瘀型疗效挑针治疗组与局麻对照组、 针刺对照组比较,差异均有非常显著性意义(P<0.01)。治疗前后疼痛指数(PRI)评分变化挑针治疗组与局麻 对照组比较,差异有非常显著性意义(P<0.01)。结论:挑针疗法治疗颈椎病是一种高效、安全的疗法。
Objective: To observe the curative effect of needle pricking (NP) for cervical spondylopathy(CS). Methods: 158 cases of CS were allocated to 2 group randomly. The NP group(56 cases) was treated by NP; local anesthesia (LA) group (47 cases) by subcutaneous injection of lidocaine; acupuncture (A) group (55 cases) by routine acupuncture as control. Results: The curative effects of 3 groups were compared, and the difference was significant ( P < 0. 05), and the difference between A group and LA group was also significant (P < 0. 05). For those with syndromes attributive to stagnation of qi and blood, the curative effect was significantly different in three groups (P < 0.01), and also between A group (P< 0. 01). The scoring of painful response index (PRI) before and after treatment was significantly different between NP group and LA group ( P < 0. 01). Conclusion: NP is highly effective and safe for CS.
出处
《新中医》
CAS
北大核心
2005年第4期65-66,共2页
New Chinese Medicine
基金
广东省中医药局资助课题(编号:101058)
关键词
颈椎病
挑治
气滞血瘀
cervical spondylopathy
needle pricking
stagnation of qi and blood
