摘要
1924年广州商团事变爆发后,蔡和森以中共重要领导人和《向导》周报主编的特殊身分,以政治史研究范式为主要方法,在第一时间运用部分第一手材料对事变爆发的原因、性质和影响作了较深入的研究,并提出了一些处理事变的方案。他的研究具有强烈的政治性、时效性和实用性等特点,奠定了后人对商团事变研究的初步基础。以今人的眼光来审视,他的研究无疑存在一些不足,但作为一家之言,特别是从商团事变研究的学术史的角度来考虑,他的研究理应受到研究者们的充分重视。
As one of the key CPC leaders and chief editor of the weekly Guide, Cai Hesen made a real-time and relatively in-depth study of the causes, nature and impact of the incident created by the Armed Corps of the Guangzhou Merchants based on the firsthand materials and with the research paradigm of political history as the main method. He also put forward some proposals for handling the incident. His studies were timely and practical with keen political insight, laying the foundation for further studies on this incident. Judged by present standards there are no doubt some drawbacks in his studies, but as a distinctive view, especially observed from the perspective of intellectual history in relation to the studies on the incident created by the Armed Corps of the Guangzhou Merchants, his studies deserve full attention from researchers.
出处
《中共党史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第2期90-96,共7页
CPC History Studies
