摘要
钱锺书先生(包括敏泽先生 )有关“意象”的某些观点似存疑点。首先,《文心雕龙·神思》里的“意象”两字,并非是“意”的偶词,其内在蕴涵包含了“意”(主体情意)和“象”(客观物象)。其次,“意象”作为一个组词,并非是由刘勰第一次提出来的,它实际上首次出现在王充《论衡·乱龙》中。另外,明前后七子与唐人诗学理论中所用的“意象”,两者的美学蕴涵相同,都是指审美情感性意象。
There are some doubts in the standpoints of Mr.Qian Zhong-shu ( including Mr.Min Ze ) concerning “imagery”.First, the meanings of “imagery” in Wen Xin Diao Long including “Yi”( the sensibility of author) and “Xiang”(the outer object) that wasn’t only equal to “Yi”. Second, “imagery” used as a phrase for the first time appeared in Lun Heng.Third,the esthetical meanings of “imagery” used by Qian Hou Qi Zi in the Ming Dynasty and the theoreticians of literature in the Tang Dynasty were the same.
出处
《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
北大核心
2005年第1期72-75,共4页
Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词
钱锺书
刘勰
意象
Qian Zhong-shu
Liu Xie
imagery
