摘要
目的为了探讨对医师科研绩效指标体系评估的有效方法，客观评估医师的科研绩效。方法应用特尔菲法建立的医师科研绩效指标体系和专家主观评估法，分别对医师的科研绩效进行评估打分，并进行比较分析。结果两种评估结果基本一致，绩效指标体系评估法优于主观评估法。结论医师科研绩效指标体系评估是一“满意”的评估，也是一动态系统，需不断完善和发展。
Objective To find out effective ways of assessing doctors' scientific research performance via an index system so as to conduct objective evaluation. Methods An index system for assessing doctors' scientific research performance established with the Delphian method and the subjective assessment by experts were used to evaluate and mark doctors' scientific scientific performance and a comparison was then made between the two assessment methods. Results The results of the two assessment methods are basically the same, with the assessment via the index system being superior to the subjective assessment by experts. Conclusion The assessment of doctors'scienhfic research peifomance via the index system is a satisfactory way of assessment. h is also a dynamic system needing further perfection and development.
出处
《中华医院管理杂志》
2001年第2期110-112,共3页
Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration
基金
卫生部基金资助课题(94-1-370)
