摘要
萨维尼创立的物权行为理论,将物权行为从债权契约中独立出来,对民法理论和实践产生很大影响.这一理论并非只是人为的抽象,是有其历史合理性和实践价值的.而且时至今日,这一理论仍有其可借鉴之处.在我国民法学中这一概念也是客观存在的,但从我国目前的民事生活现实来看,在我国物权立法中确立这一制度并无必要.
Savick' s behavior theory of right in rem has the principle of independence, principle of zero quality and principle of formism. The characteristic of the independence of the right in rem possesses the pure right in rem or unilateral right in rem, agreement of right in rem and the coexistence of behavior of right in rem and behavior of creditor in the large business deal, and so on. The right in rem of routine sails and purchase contracts, transference of bidden property and ownership of price and value does not maintain the characteristic of pure independence, for under such circumstances, the behavior of right of rem is not actually that of pure legal behavior, but maintain the dual property of law and factual behavior. The application of theory of right in rem is not entirely suitable for China's practical civil and state situation, and so it is unnecessary to establish this system of right in rem in our country.
出处
《洛阳大学学报》
2004年第4期93-96,共4页
Journal of Luoyang University
关键词
物权行为
概念
立法
behavior of right in rem
concept
legislation
