摘要
目的:探讨多伦多述情障碍92年修改版本(TAS-R)中文版的适用性,并分析其信、效度。方法:随机选择无躯体化障碍的150名正常样本进行了TAS-R量表的信度、探索性因素分析等方面的分析,并通过对正常样本与临床样本的TAS-R得分比较,分析了TAS-R的内容效度。结果:TAS-R中文版有较好的信度,探索性因素分析(EFA)的结果也与国外的结果基本一致;此外正常样本中的健康人群TAS-R得分均值显著低于亚健康人群,正常样本的TAS-R得分均值也显著地低于临床样本。结论:本研究表明,TAS-R量表具有较好的信、效度,可加以推广应用,但由于本研究取样偏小,仍需对TAS-R做进一步的研究分析。
Objective:To develop the Chinese version of The Revised Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-R) and examine its reliability and validity. Methods:A sample of 150 subjects without Somatization obstruction were selected randomly and tested by using reliability and exploring factor analysis. By comparing the results of normal sample and clinical sample, we tested the content validity of the Chinese version of TAS-R. Results:The Chinese version of TAS-R had a high reliability; and result of EFA was similar to that of the foreign research; And the mean scores of the normal sample was lower than the scores of the clinical sample. Conclusion:The Chinese version of the TAS-R was a reliable and valid measure instrument for assessing alexithymia in Chinese-speaking country.
出处
《中国心理卫生杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2005年第1期38-41,共4页
Chinese Mental Health Journal
