期刊文献+

冲击吸收功在海底油气管道安全评定中的应用 被引量:2

Application of Charpy Impact Absorbed Energy to the Safety Assessment of Offshore Pipeline
下载PDF
导出
摘要   采用欧共体提出的结构完整性评定方法,对含表面裂纹和埋藏裂纹的 API5L X65管线钢焊接接头进行安全评定。评定根据夏比冲击试验得到冲击吸收功,从而估算断裂韧性KⅠC来建立评定点进行零级评定;同时根据裂纹尖端张开位移(CTOD)试验结果进行一级评定并对二者进行了比较。评定结果表明,不论是采用零级或是一级评定,各评定点均在评定曲线定义的范围内,说明该结构是安全的。因此,在不能得到其他断裂韧性值的情况下,采用冲击吸收功进行零级评定是切实可行的,且其结果偏安全。 The European flaw assessment procedure SINTAP (Structural Integrity Assessment Procedure), was applied to assess welded joints of the API 5L X65 pipeline steel with an assumed embedded flaw and surface flaw at the weld toe. At level 0, the assessment point was established by estimating fracture toughness values KIC conservatively from Charpy energy test data. At the same time, the analysis level 1 was applied based on the fracture toughness, CTOD and then compare the two assessment levels. The results of the assessment show that all assessment points (Lr, Kr) are located within the failure lines of analysis level 0 and 1. So welded joints of the pipeline are safe. It can be concluded that the assessment based on Charpy absorbed energy is practicable in the case of no fracture toughness values and the results are conservative.
机构地区 天津大学
出处 《中国机械工程》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第3期230-234,共5页 China Mechanical Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(50375109)
关键词 失效评定曲线(FAD) 冲击功 裂纹尖端张开位移(CTOD) 安全评定 FAD(failure assessment diagram) Charpy impact energy CTOD(crack tip opening displacement) safety assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1郑隆滨,陈景毅.由夏比冲击试验结果预测断裂韧性K_(IC)转变曲线的方法[J].锅炉制造,1995(2):42-49. 被引量:1
  • 2Stephen W, Bannister A. Structural Integrity Assessment Procedure for Europe of the SlNTAP Programme Overview. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2000, 67(6): 181-514. 被引量:1
  • 3BS 7448-1991 Fracture Mechanics Toughness Tests.Part 1. Method for Determination of KIC. Critical CTOD and Critical J Values of Metallic Materials. 被引量:1
  • 4KS 7448 -1997 Fracture Mechanics Toughness Tests.Part 2. Method for Determination of KIC, Critical CTOD and Critical J Values of Welds in Metallic Materials. 被引量:1
  • 5Ainsworth R A,Gutierrez-Solana F, Ruiz J Ocejo.Analysis Levels within the SINTAP Defect Assessment Procedures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics,2000,67(6): 515-527. 被引量:1
  • 6Pisarski H G, Wallin K. The SINTAP Fracture Toughness Estimation Procedure. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2000, 67(6): 613-624. 被引量:1
  • 7Gubeljak N,Zerbst U, Kocak M. Prediction of the Maximum Load of Pre-cracked Welded Bars Using Charpy Data According to the Default Level of the European SINTAP Procedure. The International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2002, 79(2): 89 - 98. 被引量:1
  • 8Gubeljak N,Zerbst U,Predan J,et al. Application of the European SINTAP Procedure to the Failure Analysis of a Broken Forklift. Engineering Fracture Analysis. 2004.11 (1) : 33-47. 被引量:1

同被引文献15

  • 1张玉玲,王冒明,吴新如,孙振华,陶晓燕.铁路桥梁钢及焊缝的CTOD性能[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(5):585-588. 被引量:10
  • 2夏静,霍立兴,白秉仁,李小巍,曹军.焊缝非匹配海底管线缺陷在不同标准下的安全评定研究[J].压力容器,2005,22(7):4-7. 被引量:3
  • 3BS 7448 - 1997, Fracture mechanics toughness tests. Part 2. Method for determination of KIC, critical CTOD and critical J value of welds in metallic material[S]. . 被引量:1
  • 4BS7910-1999,金属结构中缺陷验收评定方法导则[S]. 被引量:2
  • 5API 1104 - 1996, Welding of Pipeline and Related Facilities[S]. 被引量:1
  • 6DNV - OS - 401 - 2001, Fabrication and testing of offshore structure [S]. 被引量:1
  • 7Jijin Xu, Ligong Chen, Chunzhen Ni. A study on the mechanical stress relieving and safety assessment without post - weld heat treatment[M]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2007, 443, 107-113. 被引量:1
  • 8邬佑靖.全焊接阀体管线球阀非热时效处理.world valve,2006,(8):37-41. 被引量:1
  • 9API 6D - 1992, Specification for pipeline valves ( Gate, Plug, Ball and Check valves)[S]. 被引量:1
  • 10ASTM A105 - 1992, Standard specification for carbon steel forgings for piping components[S]. 被引量:1

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部