摘要
在传统的科学语境中 ,亚里士多德似乎总是错误的化身。其实这是一种缺乏历史意识的误判。本文在解读亚氏相关著作基础上 ,撷取出其思想中与科学理念和科学方法紧密相关的实体、逻辑和科学三大问题进行了深度剖析与重新评估。这三大问题的提出及其求解 ,不仅昭示出亚氏科学创制的本怀 ,而且作为整个希腊科学发展的顶峰与终结 ,它还为现代科学发展奠定了坚实的理性基础 ,预示着其大致走向。
Under the traditional science circumstances, Aristotle always was regarded as an erroneous embodiment. Actually, this was kind of erroneous judgment, which lacked historic consciousness. Based on Aristotle's works, object, logic and science, which was related to his science thoughts and science methodology were deeply analyzed and re-commented. In the author's opinion, the three questions presented and answered not only showed Aristotle's original ideas, but also become the peak and end of science development in Greece. Furthermore, this also laid a solid reasonable foundation for the future science development, which predicted its roughly trend.
出处
《自然辩证法通讯》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第1期46-51,31,共7页
Journal of Dialectics of Nature
