摘要
汉代四家诗在先秦的师承源流 ,除《毛诗》自谓传自子夏 ,并有谱系流传外 ,其余三家 ,史皆无载。三家不言师承 ,并非数典忘祖 ,实由战国《诗》学传播混乱、师承不明所致。研究者多从传播主体入手 ,设定其为封闭型传播渠道 ,希图理清三家在先秦的师承脉络 ,然终劳而少功 ,他们忽略了战国《诗》传播的全开放性与学术中心的地域性转移对《诗》学观念与流派形成的影响。战国学术中心有四次大转移 ,第一个学术中心形成于三晋之魏的西河 ,其学术以古史为根柢 ,以好古为特色。第二个学术中心转移于齐之稷下 ,其学术以杂学著称 ,而又侈谈阴阳五行。第三个学术中心转移于燕国 ,其特色由中和三晋之古学与齐之阴阳学说而成。第四个学术中心转移于楚之兰陵 ,实即鲁之次室 ,由荀子居兰陵而形成。其学杂帝王之术 ,有鲜明的政治倾向性。四次学术中心的大转移 ,也是《诗》学传播中心的四次大转移 ,直接影响了汉代四家《诗》学的形成 ,成为四家《诗》
In the four schools of The Book of Songs in Han Dynasty, only Mao has the succession of teachers from a master to disciple in pre-Qin period.The other three schools have no pedigree just because of the disordered diffusion of The Book of Songs in the Warring States Period.Researchers have paid more attention to the subject of diffusion, but they have neglected the character of the diffusion of The Book of Songs in the Warring States Period——openness and regionality that had influenced the idea and school of The Book of Songs.In the Warring States Period, the academic center have four transitions successively.The first one was Xihe in the state of Wei, whose academic character was being interested in ancient history; the second one was Jixia in the state of Qi, whose academic character was with the thought of “Yinyang”as main trend; the third one was in the state of Yan, whose academic character was affected by Wei and Qi; and the fourth one was Lanling in the state of Chu, whose academic character was of obvious political trend.The four transitions is also the four transitions of the center of diffusing The Book of Songs.which have directly affected the formation of four schools of The Book of Songs in Han Dynasty.
出处
《文史哲》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第1期85-90,共6页
Literature,History,and Philosophy
基金
国家社会科学基金资助项目"中国诗经学史"的阶段性成果
项目编号 :0 2BZW 0 2 5。
关键词
战国
《诗经》
《诗》学传播中心
转移
汉四家《诗》
The Warring States Period
Center of diffusing The Book of Songs transition
Four schools of The Book of Songs in Han Dynasty
