期刊文献+

冠心病介入治疗后血管闭合装置Angio-Seal^(TM)的临床应用 被引量:2

Clinical implementation of vascular closure device Angio-Seal^(TM) for patients after percutenous coronary artery intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 评价在肝素联合强效抗血小板制剂GPⅡb Ⅲa受体拮抗剂应用的情况下 ,经皮穿刺冠状动脉介入治疗 (PCI)术后使用Angio SealTM的效果和患者的满意度。方法 本组 16 1例患者接受肝素、GPⅡb Ⅲa受体拮抗剂和常规PCI治疗 ,其中术后应用Angio SealTM(A组 ) 10 5例 ,Femostop(B组 ) 5 6例。观察两组术后止血时间、早期行走时间和血管并发症及电话随访出院后 4 8h患者的满意度 ,并进行统计学分析。结果 Angio SealTM应用成功率为 98.1%。两组术后止血时间分别是 (1.8± 2 .2 )min和 (12 9± 5 1)min (P <0 .0 0 0 1) ;术后早期开始行走时间分别为(6 .4± 2 .3)h和 (15 .2± 4 .8)h(P <0 .0 0 0 1)。A组出现 2例血肿 ,均保守治疗 ;B组分别有 3例血肿 ,2例假性动脉瘤和 1例动静脉瘘 ,其中 3例送外科手术 ;两组总血管并发症的发生率分别为 1.9%与 10 .7% (P <0 .0 5 )。术后住院时间分别为 (2 8.2± 10 .4 )h和 (5 8.4± 10 .2 )h(P <0 .0 0 0 1)。出院后 4 8h随访满意度两组分别为 93.3%和 6 0 .7% (P<0 .0 0 1)。结论 在需要强效抗凝的情况下 ,PCI术后应用Angio SealTM在即刻止血、早期行走和缩短住院时间方面均优于传统压迫方法 ,尤其是能显著降低血管并发症的发生率和提高患者的满意度。 Objective To evaluate the effect and patient satisfaction of Angio-Seal TM after PCI in patients receiving heparin and glycoprotein Ⅱb-Ⅲa inhibitors.Methods All 161 patients received heparin and GP Ⅱb-Ⅲa inhibitors and conventional PCI procedures were included.Angio-Seal TM were deployed in 105 patients (group A) and Femostops were deployed in 56 patients (group B).The time to hemostasis and the time to ambulation and vascular complications were observed.Patients were followed up by telephone 48h after discharge and patient satisfaction was evaluated.All data was statistically analysed.Results The success rate of Angio-Seal TM was 98.1%.The time to hemostasis of two groups was (1.8±2.2)min vs.(129±51)min (P<0.0001), time to early ambulation was (6.4±2.3)h vs.(15.2±4.8)h (P<0.0001) respectively.2 hematomas occurred in group A were treated by compression. In group B 3 had hematoma,2 had pseudoaneurysm and 1 had a A-V fistula,3 of them were sent for surgery.Overall vascular complications in two groups was 1.9% and 10.7% respectively (P<0.05). The postprocedure hospital stay was (28.2±10.4)h and (58.4±10.2)h respectively (P<0.0001), patient satisfaction of 48h,follow-up after discharge was 93.3% and 60.7% repectively (P<0.001).Conclusions In appropriately selected patients who need strong anticoangulation,the use of vascular closure device Angio-Seal TM is better than traditional compression in instant hemostasis,early ambulation and discharge,especially it can significantly reduce vascular complications and improve patient satisfaction.
出处 《北京医学》 CAS 北大核心 2004年第6期373-375,共3页 Beijing Medical Journal
关键词 患者 临床应用 术后应用 血管并发症 TM 止血时间 住院时间 行走 成功率 Percutaneous coronary artery intervention Vascular closure device
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Shrake KL.Vascular sealing devices: Are the advantages sustainable[].Journal of the American College of Cardiology.1999 被引量:1
  • 2Sesana M,Vaghetti M,Albiero R,et al.Effectiveness ans complications of vascular access closure devices after interventional procedures[].Journal of Invasive Cardiology.2000 被引量:1
  • 3Ward SR,Casale P,Raymond R,et al.Efficacy and safety of a hemostatic puncture closure device with early ambulation after coronary angiography[].The American Journal of Cardiology.1998 被引量:1
  • 4Duffin DC,Muhlestein JB,Allison SB,et al.Femoral arterial puncture management after percutaneous coronary procedures: a comparison of clinical outcomes and patients satisfaction between manual compression and two diffirent vascular closure devices[].Journal of Invasive Cardiology.2001 被引量:1

同被引文献22

  • 1开月梅,石兰萍,许辉.不同止血方法对冠状动脉介入术后病人的影响[J].护理学杂志(综合版),2004,19(13):13-15. 被引量:15
  • 2惠海鹏 许顶立 侯玉清.冠状动脉造影术后并发急性肺栓塞和右股深静脉血栓各1例[J].临床心血管病杂志,2000,16(5):202-202. 被引量:30
  • 3Dangas G,Mehran R,Kokolis S,et al.Vascular Complications After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Following Hemostasis With ManualCompression Versus Arteriotomy Closure Devices.J Am Coil Cardiol,2001,38 (3):638-641. 被引量:1
  • 4Koreny M,Riedmuller E,Nikfardjam M,et al.Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression aftercardiac catheterization:systematic review and meta-analysis.JAMA.2004,291(3):350-7. 被引量:1
  • 5Tony M,Chou.Vascular Complications and Arteriotomy Closure Devices During Percutaneous Coronary Procedures.JACC,2005,45 (12):2096. 被引量:1
  • 6McAlpine L,Benson RN,Aprn BC,et al.Determining best practice:Comparison of three methods of femoral sheath removal after cardiac interventional procedures.J Acute Criti Care:Heart & Lung,2005,34(2):115-121. 被引量:1
  • 7Jones T,McCutcheon.H.A randomised controlled trial comparing the use of manual versus mechanical compression to obtain haemostasis following coronary angiography.Int Critical Care Nursing,2003,19 (1):11 -20. 被引量:1
  • 8Sridhar K,Fischman D,Goldberg S et al,Peripheral vascular complication after intracoronary stent placement:prevention by use of a pneumatic vascular compression device.Catheterization Cardiovascular Diagnosis 1996,39:224-229. 被引量:1
  • 9Lehmann KG,Heath-Lange SL,Ferris ST.Randomized comparison of techniques after invasive cardiovascular procedures.Am Heart J,1999,138:1118-1125. 被引量:1
  • 10Nikolsky E,Mehran R,Halkin A,et al.Vascular Complications Associated With Arteriotomy Closure Devices in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Procedures A Meta-Analysis.J Am Coll Cardiol,2004,44 (6):1200-1209. 被引量:1

引证文献2

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部