期刊文献+

区间层次分析法的权重求解方法初探 被引量:47

Exploration on the methods of weight calculation in the interval-based AHP
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为综合比较各种区间层次分析法的权重求解方法,通过对计算结果的定性分析和定量比较,对其中5种方法的精度以及在综合评判决策中的适用性作出了评价,并指出其在实际中应用的原则。实际综合评判决策多为离线计算,对每个判断矩阵都可调用多种方法计算权重及其误差,取误差最小的权重作为结果。针对以往文献中迭代算法的缺陷提出了改进方法;研究了随机模拟法中样本容量与精度的关系及分布规律;分析了LM模型无解的原因并给出了相应的处理方法,并提出了LM模型是否存在可行解可作为区间判断矩阵一致性校验的一种方法。 For comparing the accuracies of different methods of weight calculation in interval-based analytic hierarchy process (IAHP), five methods are studied. By comparison and analysis of the results, accuracy of these methods is evaluated and the principle of applying different methods to practical multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) is concluded. In case of off-time MADM, various algorithms can be invoked and the weights with the minimal error will be the final results. In addition, some improvements are made to increase the accuracey of the iteration algorithm. As to random simulation method, the relationship between accuracy and sample capacity and the rules of probability distribution are studied. In addition, the reason that the lower model (LM) algorithm has no solution in some cases is found; and a method to avoid this situation is also proposed. It has been shown that whether the LM has a solution is a new method to determine the consistence of a judgment matrix.
出处 《系统工程与电子技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2004年第11期1597-1600,共4页 Systems Engineering and Electronics
基金 科技部科技型中小企业技术创新基金资助课题(99C26221200375)
关键词 区间层次分析法 权重 评价 迭代法 interval-based AHP weight evaluation iteration method
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Satty T L. The analytic hierarchy process[M]. McGraw-Hill, NewYork, 1980. 被引量:1
  • 2Satty T L, Vargas. Uncertainties and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1987,32:107-117. 被引量:1
  • 3Sajjad Zahir. Incorporating the uncertainties of decision judgments in the analytic hierarchy process[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1991. 53: 206-216. 被引量:1
  • 4吴育华,诸为,李新全,高荣.区间层次分析法──IAHP[J].天津大学学报,1995,28(5):700-705. 被引量:107
  • 5魏毅强,刘进生,王绪柱.不确定型AHP中判断矩阵的一致性概念及权重[J].系统工程理论与实践,1994,14(4):16-22. 被引量:191
  • 6Sugihara K, Maeda Y, Tanaka H. Interval evaluation by AHP with rough set concept[A]. Proc. on the Seventh International Workshop on Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining, and Granular-Soft Computing[C], 1999. 375-381. 被引量:1
  • 7余龙.闭区间数确定目标间相对权重探讨[J].武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版),2001,25(1):97-100. 被引量:5
  • 8Yu Chian-Son, Li Chien-Kuo. A group decision making fuzzy AHP model and its application to a plant location selection problem[A]. IFSA World Congress and 20th NAFIPS International Conference[C], Joint 9th, 2001. 76-80. 被引量:1
  • 9Tanaka H, Sugihara K. Interval probability and its application to decision problems[A]. The 10th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems[C], 2001.952-955. 被引量:1
  • 10徐泽水.AHP中两类标度的关系研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,1999,19(7):97-101. 被引量:176

二级参考文献25

共引文献579

同被引文献442

引证文献47

二级引证文献347

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部