摘要
我国刑法第306条"……引诱证人违背事实改变证言或者作伪证"中的"引诱"不应包括"诱导性询问"。改变司法实践中律师屡屡因此获罪的根本出路是修改刑法第306条,上策是取消第306条,将辩护人的妨害作证行为归并到第307条;中策是保留第306条,但取消"引诱"一词;下策是将"引诱"改为"指使"。
In Article 306 of Criminal Law of China, '…Inducing witness to change testimony against the facts or make perjury', 'inducing' should not include 'leading questioning'. The fundamental way to alter the situation that lawyers are always convicted because of it in judicial practice is to amend Article 306 of Criminal Law of China. The best policy is to eliminate Article 306 to merger defender's act of impairing testifying into Article 307. The medium policy is to retain Article 306, but to omit the word 'inducing'. The bad policy is to substitute 'instigating' for 'inducing'.
出处
《政法论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第5期157-164,共8页
Tribune of Political Science and Law
