期刊文献+

杉木人工林不同采伐方式综合效益研究 被引量:6

STUDY ON COMPREHENSIVE BENEFITS OF DIFFERENT CUTTING WAYS OF CHINESE FIR
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用层次分析法,对杉木人工林不同采伐方式的生态、社会、经济及综合效益进行分析,结果表明:经济效益方面,皆伐最高,70%择伐次之,50%择伐第三,30%择伐最小;生态效益方面,70%择伐最高,皆伐最小;社会效益方面,50%择伐最高,皆伐最小。综合效益以70%强度择伐最大,50%择伐其次,皆伐第三,30%择伐最小。建议杉木林主伐采用强度为70%择伐方式进行。 The ecological, social,economic and comprehensive benefits of different cutting methods of Chinese fir were analysed by AHP.The results showed that the economic benefit of clear cutting method was highest,seventy percent selective cutting was second ,the third was fifty percent cutting,and the economic benefit of thirty percent cutting was lowest.As to ecological benefit, seventy percent selective cutting was highest,clear cutting method was lowest.In social benefit,fifty percent cutting method was the best,clear cutting method was the lowest.The comprehensive benefit of seventy percent cutting method was the highest,the second one was fifty percent cutting method,clear cutting method was the third one, thirty percent cutting method was the lowest.The paper suggested that seventy percent cutting method should be used to harvest Chinese fir.
作者 邹礼光
出处 《防护林科技》 2004年第6期22-23,76,共3页 Protection Forest Science and Technology
关键词 杉木 人工林 采伐方式 综合效益 层次分析法 AHP Chinese fir Cutting method Comprehensive benefits
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1赵焕臣著..层次分析法[M].北京:科学出版社,1986.
  • 2中国科学院南京土壤研究所编..土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1978:593.
  • 3张万儒 许本彤.森林土壤定位研究方法[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1986.1-45. 被引量:87
  • 4洪伟.计量林学研究[M].电子科技大学出版社,1993.. 被引量:25
  • 5谭跃进 陈英武 易先进.系统工程理论[M].长沙:国防科技大学出版社,1999.. 被引量:1
  • 6孙启祥,吴泽民,韦朝领,彭镇华.有螺江滩林农复合生态系统不同调控模式的综合效益评价[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(2):195-198. 被引量:15
  • 7杨启帆 方道元.数学模型[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,1999.. 被引量:1

二级参考文献8

共引文献124

同被引文献235

引证文献6

二级引证文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部