期刊文献+

驳唐代进士难、明经易说 被引量:2

Contradicton to the Idea of More Difficult Enrollment for Jinshi Than for Mingjing in Tang Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近几十年流行唐代进士难、明经易说,所持理由一是两科录取率相差悬殊,二是两科考试内容不同,难易有差。考察具体情况,不是这么回事。实际情况是,进士、明经,难易相当。 In the recent decades, the viewpoint is popular that in Tang Dynasty it was mo re difficult for the candidate of Jinshi to pass the imperial examinations than that of Mingjing. The first reason is that the rate of enrollment of the two was quite different, and the second reason is that the contents of the imperial examinations were not the same:the former was difficult and the latter was easy. Observing carefully the specific situations of both, it is not true.The fact was that the examinations for both Jinshi an d Mingjing were of the same difficulty.
作者 郭绍林
出处 《史学月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第1期34-38,共5页 Journal of Historical Science
关键词 唐代 进士 明经 录取率 考试 Tang Dynasty Jinshi Mingjing rate of enrollment imperial examination
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1范文澜著..中国通史简编 第3编 第1册[M].北京:人民出版社,1965:444.
  • 2全唐文[Z].上海:上海古籍出版社, 1990. 被引量:8
  • 3旧唐书[M].北京:中华书局,1997. 被引量:7
  • 4新唐书[M].北京:中华书局,1997. 被引量:7
  • 5.唐会要[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1991.. 被引量:14
  • 6唐摭言[M].上海:古典文学出版社,1957. 被引量:1
  • 7登科记考[M].北京:中华书局,1984. 被引量:2
  • 8岑仲勉著..隋唐史 上[M].北京:中华书局,1982:356.
  • 9大唐六典[M].日本广池本,1973. 被引量:1
  • 10.通典[M].北京:中华书局,1984.. 被引量:18

共引文献51

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部