摘要
目的:观察Profile机动镍钛针根管预备器械预备根管,热融胶针充填根管与传统根管治疗方法的临床效果。方法:将患者随机分为3组,A组:Profile预备根管,热融胶针充填根管。B组:Profile预备根管,碘仿糊剂牙胶尖根充。C组:手工法不锈钢扩大针预备根管,碘仿糊剂牙胶尖根充。结果:经X线片和临床对比观察,A组优于B组,B组优于C组。结论:Profile机动镍钛针预备根管,工作效率高,根管预备形态好,省时省力。热融胶针充填根管恰充率明显高于其他方法。经过Profile预备的根管,使用国产材料根充同样可以达到满意效果。手工预备根管和传统侧压法根充较费时费力,恰充率低于机动预备和热融胶针根充组。
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical effects of three root canal treatments. METHODS: The patients were randomly divided into A,B,C groups. Group A:profile preparation of the root canal, then the root canal was filled with maillefer thermafil. Group B:profile preparation of the root canal, iodoform cataplasm and gutta percha point was used to fill root canal. Group C:preparation of the root canal with stainless steel hand-operated root canal magnified instrument, iodoform cataplasm and gutta percha point was used to fill the root canal. RESULTS: Through X ray and clinical evaluation, the root canal therapy result in group A was superior to group B, group B was superior to group C. CONCLUSION: The work efficiency of preparative instrument of profile flexible nickel-titanium root canal is high. The successful rate of maillefer thermafil for results root canal therapy is superior to the other methods. Root canal preparation by profile can get satisfying effects .
出处
《上海口腔医学》
CAS
CSCD
2004年第5期459-461,共3页
Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
关键词
镍钛合金
机动预备
根管治疗
热融胶针
Nickel-titanium alloy
Flexible preparation
Root canal cure
Maillefer thermafil.
