期刊文献+

头孢泊肟酯片治疗急性细菌性感染158例的多中心随机对照研究 被引量:9

A randomized multicenter clinical study of cefpodoxime proxetil tablets in treatment of acute bacterial infections in 158 patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :评价国产头孢泊肟酯片治疗急性细菌性感染的有效性和安全性。方法 :采用多中心、随机对照研究方法 ,以进口头孢泊肟酯片为对照 ,2组的用量、用法及疗程均为 10 0mg ,po ,bid ,疗程 7~14d。结果 :本研究共入组 175例病人 ,可进行临床疗效评价分析的病例 15 8例 ,试验组 77例 ,对照组81例。试验组总痊愈率和有效率分别为 70 %和92 % ;对照组总痊愈率和有效率分别为 79%和94 % ,2组细菌清除率分别为 98%和 98% ,2组比较差异均无显著意义 (P >0 .0 5 )。试验组和对照组的不良反应发生率分别为 9%和 2 % ,主要表现为口干、恶心、腹部不适及转氨酶增高等。结论 :国产头孢泊肟酯片治疗急性细菌性感染临床疗效确切 ,安全性较好。 AIM: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of domestic cefpodoxime proxetil tablets in the treatment of acute bacterial infections. METHODS: A randomized multicenter clinical study was conducted for comparing domestic cefpodoxime proxetil tablets with inported cefpodoxime proxetil tablets. Both were administered orally at a dose of 100 mg twice daily for 7 to 14 days. RESULTS: Altogether, 175 patients were enrolled in the study. Among them 158 patients were eligible for clinical efficacy analysis inclnding 77 in domestic cefpodoxime proxetil proxetil group, 81 in control group. The cure rates and effective rates were 70 % and 92 %in domestic cefpodoxime proxetil group; and 79 % and 94 %in control group, respectively. The bacterial eradication rates were 98 % and 98 %, respectively. There were no statistically significant difference between the two treatment groups. Adverse reactions were observed for 9 % and 2 % of patients in the two groups, dominated by thirsty, nausea, abdominal discomfort and elevated transaminases. CONCLUSION: Domestic cefpodoxime proxetil tablet is effective and safe for the treatment of acute bacterial infections.
出处 《中国新药与临床杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第11期739-741,共3页 Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies
关键词 细菌感染 随机对照试验 多中心研究 头孢泊肟 bacterial infections randomized controlled trials multicenter studies cefpodoxime
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1CHUGH K,AGRAWAL S. Cefpodoxime:pharmacokinetics and therapeutic uses[J].Indian J Pediatr,2003,70(3):227-231. 被引量:1
  • 2PERIC M,BROWNE FA, JACOBS MR, et al. Activity of nine oral agents against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria encountered in community-acquired infections:use of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints in the comparative assessment of beta-lactam 被引量:1
  • 3HOBAN D,WAITES K, FELMINGHAM D. Antimicrobial susceptibility of community-acquired respiratory tract pathogens in North America in 1999-2000:findings of the PROTEKT surveillance study[J].Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis,2003,45(4):251-259. 被引量:1
  • 4PICHICHERO ME,CASEY JR. Acute otitis media disease management[J].Minerva Pediatr,2003,55(5):415-438. 被引量:1
  • 5ABE T,FUKUOKA T,SATO Y,et al. Antibacterial activity of cefpodoxime against clinical isolates in 20000 and 2001[J].Jpn J Antibiot,2002,55(6):827-843. 被引量:1
  • 6HANKE K,BLUM SP. Observational study of the tolerance and effectiveness of cefpodoxime proxetil in general practice[J].Fortschr Med Orig,2002,120(1):21-28. 被引量:1
  • 7ARACIL B,GOMEZ-GARCES JL,ALOS JI. Sensitivity of Haemophilus influenzae isolates in Spain to 17 oral antibiotics[J].Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin,2003,21(3):131-136. 被引量:1

同被引文献54

引证文献9

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部