期刊文献+

可推知照应再考——专就语篇中的照应性名词短语而论 被引量:3

Inferable Anaphora Re-examined: With Special Reference to the Anaphoric NPs in Discourse
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文根据国外语用和认知方面的研究理论专门探讨名词(短)语特别是有定名词语在语篇中的可推知照应的用法。文章主要包括四个方面的内容和意义。第一,阐述可推知照应的理据;第二,论述语境因素对照应理解和建构产生的效力;第三,在分析的基础上尝试性地改善了“已知性等级”模式;最后,论证通常被视为无照应作用的不定名词语在一定语境下具有照应性。 This article explores specially the use of inferable anaphoric NPs, esp. definite NPs, in discourse based on some foreigners' pragmatic and cognitive studies. The article is chiefly concerned with four aspects of the subject as follows. First, it gives a good explanation of the theoretical motivations for inferable anaphora in discourse. Second, it discusses the effects, caused by contextual factors, on the interpretation and production of inferable anaphors. Third, it improves 'the Givenness Hierarchy' [5], following careful analyses. Finally, it proves that the alleged non-anaphoric indefinite NPs may well act as inferable anaphors in some contexts.
作者 刘礼进
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第5期28-33,共6页 Journal of Foreign Languages
关键词 语境 名词短语 语篇 可推知照应理论 语法 NP inferable anaphora specific reference
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Charolles, M. Associative anaphora and its interpretation [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1999, 31:311-326. 被引量:1
  • 2Carter, D. Interpreting Anaphors in Natural Language Texts [M]. Chichester: Ellis Horwood,1987. 被引量:1
  • 3Erku, E & J K Gundel. The pragmatics of indirect anaphors[A]. Verschueren & Bertuccelli-Papi. The Pragmatic Perspective [C].Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1987. 被引量:1
  • 4Fraumd, K. Cognitive ontology and NP form [A].Thorstein Frethein & J. K. Gundel. Reference and Accessibility [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins,1996. 被引量:1
  • 5Gundel, J K, N Hedberg & R Zacharski.Cognitive stares and the form of referring expressions in discourse [J]. Language, 1993, 69:274-307. 被引量:1
  • 6Gundel, J K. Relevance theory meets the givenness hierarchy [A]. Thorstein Frethein & J K Gundel. Reference and Accessibility [C].Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1996. 被引量:1
  • 7Hawkins, J. On (in)definite articles: Implicature and (un)grammaticality prediction [J]. Journal of Linguistics, 1991, 27: 405-442. 被引量:1
  • 8Huang, Y. Anaphora: A Cross-linguistic Approach[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. 被引量:1
  • 9Levinson, S C. Pragmatic reduction of the Binding Condition revisited [J]. Journal of Linguistics, 1991, 27: 107-161. 被引量:1
  • 10Levinson, S C. Presumptive Meaning: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature[M]. MA: MIT Press, 2000. 被引量:1

二级参考文献10

  • 1[1]Blakemore,Diane.1987.Semantic Constraints on Relevance.Oxford: Blackwell. 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Blakemore,Diane.1990.Constraints on interpretations.In Berkeley Linguistics Society (ed.).Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meetings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.Berkeley. 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Blakemore,Diane.1992.Understanding Utterances.Oxford: Blackwell. 被引量:1
  • 4[4]Grice,H.P.1989.Studies in the Way of Words.Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press. 被引量:1
  • 5[5]Hovey,Edward H.& Maier.Elisabeth.1990."Parsimonious or profligate: How many and which discourse structure relations?".In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation,128-136. 被引量:1
  • 6[6]Jucker,A.H.& Ziv,Yael.1998.Discourse markers: descriptions and theory.Armsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 被引量:1
  • 7[7]Matsui,Tomoko.2000.Bridging and relevance.John Benjamins B.V. 被引量:1
  • 8[8]Rouchota,V.1996.Discourse connectives: what do they link? UCL Working Papers in Linguistics.No.8. 被引量:1
  • 9[9]Sperber,D.& D.Wilson.1986/1995.Relevance: Communication and Cognition.Oxford: Blackwell. 被引量:1
  • 10[10]van Dijk,1979.The analysis of speech act verbs: theoretical preliminaries,Journal of Pragmatics 3 (1979) 457-460. 被引量:1

共引文献70

同被引文献54

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部