期刊文献+

近12年中国民航人因事故与事故征候的分类研究(英文) 被引量:5

A Classification on Human Factor Accident/Incident of China Civil Aviation in Recent Twelve Years
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对中国民航 1 990~ 2 0 0 1年期间发生的人因事故征候和飞行事故进行分类研究。方法运用Reason事故链模型 ,结合中国民航的传统分类方法 ,制订人因事故与事故征候分类标准 ,在此基础上按分类标准进行分类统计和分析。结果 1 )在飞行的各个阶段中 ,滑行和巡航阶段小于间隔飞行的事故征候发生的百分比高于起飞、爬升、下降以及进近阶段。 2 )事故征候的主要类型为偏出、冲出跑道 ,危险接近 ,擦机尾或翼尖、发动机以及地面撞障碍物。 3)飞行事故的主要表现形式是机组原因造成飞机失控、撞山以及冲出跑道。 4)基本驾驶术有所下降 ,主要表现为修正偏差的能力不足。 5 )机组错误的主要表现是操纵不当、违反规章程序飞行、迷航及飞错高度。结论不良的驾驶舱资源管理技能是影响我国民航飞行安全的主要因素 ,这与国际上的研究相符。但事故征候高发阶段、机组错误的类型和表现形式等 ,与国际上航空发达国家相比差异较大 ,具有明显的特点。要进一步改善我国民航的航空安全水平 ,必须针对我国民航的特点 。 Objective To study human factor accident/incident occurred during 1990~2001 using new classification standard. Method The human factor accident/incident classification standard is developed on the basis of Reason's Model, combining with CAAC’s traditional classifying method, and applied to the classified statistical analysis for 361 flying incidents and 35 flight accidents of China civil aviation, which is induced by human factors and occurred from 1990 to 2001. Result 1) the incident percentage of taxi and cruise is higher than that of takeoff, climb and descent. 2) The dominating type of flight incidents is diverging of runway, overrunning, near-miss, tail/wingtip/engine strike and ground obstacle impacting. 3) The top three accidents are out of control caused by crew, mountain collision and over runway. 4) Crew’s basic operating skill is lower than what we imagined, the mostly representation is poor correcting ability when flight error happened. 5) Crew errors can be represented by incorrect control, regulation and procedure violation, disorientation and diverging percentage of correct flight level. Conclusion The poor CRM skill is the dominant factor impacting China civil aviation safety, this result has a coincidence with previous study, but there is much difference and distinct characteristic in top incident phase, the type of crew error and behavior performance compared with that of advanced countries. We should strengthen CRM training for all of pilots aiming at the Chinese pilot behavior characteristic in order to improve the safety level of China civil aviation.
作者 罗晓利
出处 《航天医学与医学工程》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第5期318-321,共4页 Space Medicine & Medical Engineering
关键词 民用航空医学 人的因素 机组资源管理 分类标准 飞行事故 civil aviation medicine human factors crew resource management classification standard flight accidents
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1XiaoLi Luo. Human factor in flight[M]. Chengdu:Southwestern Jiaotong university publishing houses, 2002.9-11. 被引量:1
  • 2XiaoLi Luo. Cockpit resource management[M].Chengdu: Southwestern Jiaotong university publishing houses, 2002.4. 被引量:1
  • 3Shappel SA, Wiegman DA. A human error approach to Accident Investigation: The Taxonomy of Unsafe Operations[J]. The International Journal of Aviation psychology(1997a), 1997,7:269-291. 被引量:1
  • 4Shappel SA, Wiegman DA. A Reliability Analysis of The Taxonomy of Unsafe Operations (Abstract)[J]. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine(1997b),1997,69:620. 被引量:1
  • 5Shappel SA,Wiegman DA. The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System-HFACS (Report Number DOT/FAA/AM-007)[R]. Washington DC: Federal Aviation Administration,2000. 被引量:1
  • 6Wiegman DA,Shappel SA. A Human Error Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents Using The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS). (Report Number DOT/FAA/AM-01/3)[R]. Washington DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 2001. 被引量:1
  • 7Reason J.Human error[M]. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press,1990.21-26. 被引量:1
  • 8European Air Traffic Management Programme. The Human Error in ATM Technique(HERA-JANUS)[R].Edition Number:1.0.European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation,2003. 被引量:1
  • 9D·A·Wiegman,S·A·Shappel·Aplying the Huamn Factors Analysis and Classification System(HFACS)to the Commercial Aviation Accident Data[R].Proceeding of the Tenth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 2001. 被引量:1

同被引文献30

  • 1杜红兵,李珍香.进近着陆运输飞行事故原因及预防对策研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(6):118-122. 被引量:44
  • 2International Civil Aviation Organization.Safety management manual,DOC 9859-AN/460[M].Montreal:International Civil Aviation Organization,2006. 被引量:1
  • 3International Civil Aviation Organization.Line operations safety audit,DOC 9803-AN/761[M].Montreal:International Civil Aviation Organization,2002. 被引量:1
  • 4International Civil Aviation Organization.Normal operations safety survey,DOC 9910-AN/473[M].Montreal:International Civil Aviation Organization,2008. 被引量:1
  • 5Intentional Civil Aviation Organization.Safety oversight audit manual,DOC 9735-AN/960[M].2nd ed.Montreal:International Civil Aviation Organization,2006. 被引量:1
  • 6SEAMSTER,THOMAS L,KANKI,et al.Aviation information management:from document to data[M].Aldershot:Ashgate,2002. 被引量:1
  • 7WIEGMANN D,SHAPPELL S.Human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents:application of the human factors analysis and classification system[J].Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine,2001,72(11):1006-1016. 被引量:1
  • 8DODD B.Safety data integration can lead to better understanding of risk[J].Intentional Civil Aviation Organization Journal,2007(2):21-22. 被引量:1
  • 9Intentional Civil Aviation Organization.Annex 13 to the convention on international civil aviation:aircraft accident and incident investigation[M].9th ed.Montreal:International Civil Aviation Organization,2001. 被引量:1
  • 10Civil Aviation Administration of China(中国民航局).Regulation on Civil Aviation Safety Information Management(民航航空安全信息管理规定)[M].Beijing:Civil Aviation Administration of China,2007. 被引量:1

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部