期刊文献+

急性心肌梗死直接冠状动脉内支架置入的临床评价 被引量:2

Study of emergency direct coronary stenting in patients with acute myocardial infarction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨急诊直接冠脉内支架置入术治疗ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死 (AMI)的价值。方法 ST段抬高型AMI患者 133例 ,分别行直接冠脉内支架置入术 (直接支架组 ,81例 )和球囊预扩张后支架置入术 (常规支架组 ,5 2例 )。对比两组患者的介入治疗、术后TIMI分级和心电图、出院前左室射血分数 (LVEF)和住院期间主要不良心脏事件发生率。结果 直接支架组和常规支架组基础临床特征、TIMI 3级和无复流均无统计学显著差异 (P >0 .0 5 )。直接支架组平均X线曝光时间和造影剂用量均显著低于常规支架组 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,而平均LVEF显著高于常规支架组 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,且ST段无回落的发生率和住院期间主要不良心脏事件发生率均显著降低 (P <0 .0 5 )。结论 对于ST段抬高型AMI中适当的冠状动脉病变 ,直接冠脉内支架置入术不仅可以减少X线曝光时间和造影剂用量 ,而且可能改善患者的心肌组织再灌注和近期预后。 Objective To assess the significance of emergency direct coronary stenting in patients with acute myocardial infarction of ST-segment elevation(STAMI). Methods 133 patients with STAMI received direct coronary stenting(DS,n=85) or conventional post-dilatation stenting(CS,n=65). The conditions of intervention procession, TIMI grade and electrocardiogram after intervention, left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) and major adverse cardiac events(MACE) in hospital were compared between patients receiving DS and patients receiving CS. Results There were no significant differences in general clinical characters, the conditions of TIMI 3 and no-reflow between the two groups(P>0.05). But the time of X-ray exposure and the amount of contrast agent were significantly less(P<0.05), and LVEF was significantly higher (P<0.05) in patients receiving DS than patients receiving CS. The incidence of no ST-segment resolution and MACE in hospital decreased in patients receiving DS(P<0.05). Conclusion For the properly selected lesions in STAMI, direct stenting may not only reduce the time of X-ray exposure and the amount of contrast agent, but also improve myocardial reperfusion and recent prognosis.
出处 《中国急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第9期640-642,共3页 Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine
关键词 急性心肌梗死 经皮经腔冠状动脉成形术 支架 再灌注 Myocardial infarction Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty(PTCA) Stents Reperfusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[1]Hamon M, Richardeau Y, Lecluse E, et al . Direct coronary stenting without balloon predilation in acute coronary syndromes[J]. Am Heart J,1999,138:55 - 59. 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Loubeyre C, Morice MC, Lefevre T, et al . A randomized comparison of direct stenting with conventional stent implantation in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002,39:15 -21. 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Santoro GM, Valenti R, Buonamici P, et al . Relation between STsegment changes and myocardial perfusion evaluated by myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with direct angioplasty[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1998,82:932- 937. 被引量:1
  • 4[4]Claeys MJ, Bosmans J, Veenstra L, et al . Determinants and prognostic implications of persistent ST - segment elevation after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: importance of microvascular reperfusion injury on clinical outcome[J]. Circulation, 1999, 99:1972 - 1977. 被引量:1
  • 5[5]Antoniucci D, Valenti R, Migliorini A, et al . Direct infarct artery stenting without predilation and no- reflow in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Am Heart J, 2001,142:684-690. 被引量:1

同被引文献22

  • 1胡大一.我为什么倡导救治急性心肌梗死的绿色通道[J].前进论坛,2001(8):33-34. 被引量:23
  • 2急性心肌梗塞溶栓疗法参考方案(1996年7月修订)[J].中华心血管病杂志,1996,24(5):328-329. 被引量:1321
  • 3Figulla HE, Mudra H, Beifart N, et al. Direct coronary stenting without predilation [ J]. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1998,43(2) :245-252. 被引量:1
  • 4Pentousis D,Guerin Y, Funck F, et al. Direct stent implantation without predilatation using the multilink stent[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1998,82(5) : 1437-1440. 被引量:1
  • 5Martinez-Elbal L, Ruiz-Nodar JM,Zueco J, et al. Direct coronary stenting versus stenting with balloon pre-dilatation: immediate and follow-up results of multicentre, prospective, randomized study. The DISCO trial[J] .Ettr Heart J,2002,23(8) :633-640. 被引量:1
  • 6Hamon M, Richardeau Y, Lecluse E, et al. Direct coronary stenting without balloon predilation in acute coronary syndromes[J]. Am Heart J, 1999,138( 1 ) : 55-59. 被引量:1
  • 7Khalife K, Citron B, Mourali S, et al. Is direct stenting a safe and effective therapy for a coronary artery stenting? Results of the randomized BET study[J] .Eur Heart J,2000,21[Abstract Suppl] :A1518. 被引量:1
  • 8Wilson SH, Berger PB, Mathew V, et al. Immediate and late outcomes after direct stent implantation without balloon predilatation[J ]. J Am Coil Cardiol,2000,35(4) :937-943. 被引量:1
  • 9Chevalier B, Stables R, Te Riele J, et al. Safety and feasibility of direc tstenting strategy with the ACS MultiLink Duet Stent: Results from the SLIDE randomized trial[ J]. Circulatoin, 2000,102[ Suppl Ⅱ ] :730. 被引量:1
  • 10Legutko J, Dudek D, Bartus S, et al. Comparison of stent expansion after direct stenting with optimal balloon predilatation. Intracoronary ultrasound study[J] .Eur Heart J,2000,21[Abstract Suppl] :1515. 被引量:1

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部