摘要
传统的国际贸易理论和国际直接投资理论建立在完全不同的分析框架之内,存在着天然的隔阂。前者以国家为基本分析单位,在新古典分析框架内,在国际间资本不流动的非现实性假定中,利用比较优势来解释国际贸易的原因、结构和结果,建立了一个完美的自由贸易理论模型。而后者则以公司为基本分析单位,以市场不完全竞争为前提,解释公司为什么投资、凭什么投资、向哪投资等问题。但随着经济的发展和理论研究的深入,人们发现,贸易和投资实际上是同一行为主体的不同选择,两者之间应有共同的基础,国际贸易理论和国际直接投资理论开始由分歧走向交叉和融合。
Traditional international trade theories and international direct investment theories are
not compatible. Focusing on the state as a basic unit for analysis and based on the hypothesis that
there is no capital flow internationally, the former, within the framework of neo-classicalism, takes
advantage of comparison to explain the causes, structures and consequences of the international trade
and establishes a perfect theoretical model of free trade. The latter, with a focus on the corporation as
an analytical unit, and an imperfect market competition as the premise, makes clear why, how and in
whom a company invests. With the development of economy and the researches in this respect, it has
been found that trade and investment share some common ground in decision making, for both of them
are nothing but two alternative ways to do business. Thus, the two theories are becoming complemen-
tary.
出处
《南京大学学报（哲学．人文科学．社会科学）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第5期95-101,118,共8页
Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词
国际贸易理论
国际直接投资理论
international trade theory
international direct investment theory
