期刊文献+

2001年雅江6.0级地震序列震源机制解与应力场分析 被引量:3

Analysis on focal mechanism solution and stress filed of Yajiang M_s6. 0 earthquake sequence in 2001
下载PDF
导出
摘要 叙述了利用P波初动和短周期体波振幅联合测定震源机制解和利用震源机制解求取区域主应力张量的方法,采用成都遥测数字地震台网在2001年2月雅江Ms 5.0、Ms 6.0地震前后的3.0级以上的26个地震,共14个台站的垂直分向速度波形记录进行计算。使用主事件定位法,确定了这些地震较准确的震中位置,并在此后的计算中采用该数据。震源机制解结果表明:5.0和6.0级地震与另外3次地震为走滑型,呈北东向分布;而外围的其他21次地震全部是倾滑型。分析认为,雅江震区位于鲜水河断裂带南端西侧的以贡嘎山为中心的地壳隆起区内,地壳的抬升运动导致震源体的形成,两种破裂方式与之有关。前震与余震时段的最大主压应力σ1轴的方向大致相同,5.0和6.0级地震期间,σ1轴的方向偏转了约100°。 The method of joint determination of focal mechanism solution and stress field using P wave polarities and short-period body wave amplitudas are presented, using 26 earthquakes (M≥3) of 2001 Yajiang Ms5. 0 and Ms6. 0 earthquake sequence with 14 vertical component velocity waveform records which are from Chengdu telemetry seismic network. More accu-rate epicenter location data were obtained by use of the master event technique for the follow-ing computation. The results show that the focal mechanism solutions of 5 earthquakes (in-cluding Ms5. 0 and Ms6. 0) are strike slip type; and others are dip slip type. The further a-nalysis indicate that 2 rupture ways were resulted from the formation of earthquake focus which is caused by earth crust uplift motion, since Yajiang earthquake area is located at the south-west side of Xianshuihe fault zone and within the crust uplift region which Gonggas-han mountain is considered to be the center. In addition, the direction of major principal stress axis are almost the same before and after the main shock, but the direction rotated a-bout 100° during Ms5. 0 and Ms6. 0's occurrences.
出处 《地震地磁观测与研究》 2004年第4期48-55,共8页 Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research
基金 国家"十五"科技攻关项目<强地震短期预测技术研究>02-03-04课题资助
关键词 雅江6.0级地震 震源机制 应力场 Yajiang Ms6. 0 earthquake, focal mechanism, stress field
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1[6]Fitch T J. 1975. Compressional velocity in source regions of deep earthquakes: an application of the master event technique [J]. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 26,156~166 被引量:1
  • 2[7]Gephart J W and Forsyth D W. 1984. An improved method for determining the regional stress tensor using earthquake focal mechanism data:application to the San Fernando earthquake sequence[J]. J G R, 89,9 305~9 320. 被引量:1
  • 3[8]Nakamura A, Horiuchi S and Hasegawa A. 1999. Joint Focal mechanism Determination With Source- Region Station Corrections Using Short - Period Body - Wave Amplitude Data[J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer. 89, 373~383 被引量:1
  • 4[9]Rutain T G, Khalturin V I, Martynov V G and Monlar P. 1978. Preliminary analysis of spectral content of P and S wave from local earthquakes in the Garm, Tadijikstan Region [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer,68,949~971 被引量:1

同被引文献200

引证文献3

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部