摘要
There are actually two dimensions consisting of the fundamental sense of "good": the being sphere to be a man, and the social normal requirements to be with good attitude with other in daily life. Therefore they can be marked respectively by two categories: morality and ethic. For the former,morality is the core that man should be a man, with the characteristics of supera-utility and metaphysical. For the latter, ethic norms are the instrumental good that serves the utilitarian goal of life by coordinating different interests relation among the people.from this perspective, the theoretical conflicts among the different ethics schools such as "deontology", "consequentialism" and "virtue ethics" are, to a certain extent, associated directly with the lack of clear analysis about the distinction of these two dimensions. In practice, the unrealistic moral requirements posed in terms of utilitarian purpose will hurt both the moral and the ethic.
There are actually two dimensions consisting of the fundamental sense of 'good': the being sphere to be a man, and the social normal requirements to be with good attitude with other in daily life. Therefore they can be marked respectively by two categories: morality and ethic. For the former,morality is the core that man should be a man, with the characteristics of supera-utility and metaphysical. For the latter, ethic norms are the instrumental good that serves the utilitarian goal of life by coordinating different interests relation among the people.from this perspective, the theoretical conflicts among the different ethics schools such as 'deontology', 'consequentialism' and 'virtue ethics' are, to a certain extent, associated directly with the lack of clear analysis about the distinction of these two dimensions. In practice, the unrealistic moral requirements posed in terms of utilitarian purpose will hurt both the moral and the ethic.
出处
《哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2002年第6期67-73,共7页
Philosophical Research
