期刊文献+

美国监狱私有化原因研究 被引量:5

A Study on the Causes of Privatization of Prison in the U.S.
原文传递
导出
摘要 私有化是将政府整体或部分职责转移到私人部门的过程,监狱私有化意味着私人部门参与提供传统上由政府提供的管教服务。探究美国监狱私有化的原因,有助于估计私人监狱运动的发展前景。美国监狱私有化现象的主要动因在于快速增长的囚犯、监狱过度拥挤和成本问题。尽管监狱私有化不一定向声称的那样能够大幅度降低成本和提高效率,但是真正重要的是认识到私有化节约成本和提高效率本身是竞争过程的结果。最为重要的事情是决定如何最好地提供有关服务,而不是简单地选择要么由公共部门,要么由私人部门负责监狱体系的运转。通过引入竞争力量与机制,监狱私有化也许仍然有发展的空间。 Privatization is commonly defined as any process aimed at shifting functions and responsibilities, in whole or in part, from the government to the private sector. Prison privatization means that the private sectors' participation of criminal correction which was traditionally seen as the sole accountability of government. Exploration into the causes of prison privatization in the U.S. will help us to estimate the future of private prison movement. In the U.S., rapid growth of prison population, overcrowding and cost problems are the driving force behind the prison privatization phenomenon. Although claims of significant cost - saving and improved efficiency of private prisons have not proven true, what really counts is the recognition that cost saving from privatization and efficiency improvement are themselves products of competition process. The most important thing is the decision on how to best deliver programs and services, not a simple dichotomized choice between the public sector and the private sector in running prison system. By introducing the force and mechanism of competition, the future of prison privatization may have enough room to develop.
作者 王廷惠
出处 《财贸经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第9期76-80,共5页 Finance & Trade Economics
关键词 监狱私有化 节约成本 提高效率 私人部门 竞争 Prison Privatization, Cost-saving, Efficiency Improvement, Private Sector, Competition
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Ammon, D , Campbell, R , and Somoza, S , The Option of Prison Privatization : A Guide for Community Deliberations. Athens,GA : University of Georgia, 1992. 被引量:1
  • 2Barzelay, M ,Breaking Through Bureaucracy; A New Vision for Managing in Government. San Francisco: University of California Press, 1992. 被引量:1
  • 3Bos, D , Privatization in Europe: A Comparison of Approaches. Oxford of Review of Economic Policy, 9(1) : 1993 ,pp.95 - 111. 被引量:1
  • 4Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2001, Emerging Issues on Privatized Prisons, available at http://www. ncjrs. org/pdffidesl/bja/181249. pdf. 被引量:1
  • 5Brakel, S J , Prison Management, Private Enterprise Style : The Inmates' Evaluation. New England Journal of Criminal and Civil Confinement, 14(2) : 1988, pp. 175 - 244. 被引量:1
  • 6Butler, S , Privatization for Public Purposes, in William Gorndey, ed, Privatization and Its Alternatives, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991 ,pp. 17 - 24. 被引量:1
  • 7Clark, J L , Report to the Attorney General : Inspection and Review of Northeast Ohio Correctional Center. Washington, DC: Office of the Corrections Trustee for the District of Columbia, 1998. 被引量:1
  • 8Cunningham, D , Public Strategies for Private Prisons. Paper presented at the Private Prison Workshop held January 29-30, 1999,at the Institute on Criminal Justice, University of Minnesota Law School. 被引量:1
  • 9DiIulio, J J , Jr , Private Prisons. National Institute of Justice, Crime File Study guide, U S Department of Justice, 1988. 被引量:1
  • 10Gaes, G G , Camp, S D , and Saylor, W G , Appendix 2: Comparing the Quality of Publicly and Privately Operated Prisons, A Review. McDonald, D , Fournier, E , Russell - Einhom, M , and Crawford, S , eds , Private Prisons in the United States : An Assessment of Current Practice. Boston, MA : Abt Associates Inc, 1998. 被引量:1

同被引文献69

  • 1王廷惠.美国监狱签约外包简评[J].国家行政学院学报,2004(5):86-89. 被引量:7
  • 2王廷惠.美国监狱私有化:目标与效果分析[J].中国行政管理,2005(6):106-109. 被引量:6
  • 3松尾浩也.日本刑事诉讼法(上卷)[M].丁相顺译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005:331. 被引量:8
  • 4柯良栋.谈谈修改刑事诉讼法必须高度重视的几个问题[J].法学家,2007(4):1-5. 被引量:13
  • 5GAO,1996, Private and Public Prisons: Studies Comparing Operational Costs and/or Quality.of Service, Washington. D.C. 被引量:1
  • 6Logan, C.H. , 1991, "Well Kept: Comparing the Quality of Confinement in Private and Public Prisons", The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83(3) : 577 - 613;McGriff, B. , 1989, Comparing the Costs of Public and Private Prisons : A Case Study, Washington, D. C. , U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. 被引量:1
  • 7McDonald, D.C.,and Patten,C.,2004,"Governments' Management of Private Prisons". 被引量:1
  • 8Sellers, M. P. , 1989. Private and Public Prisons: A Comparison of Costs, Programs, and Facilities. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology.33(3):241 - 256. 被引量:1
  • 9Urban Institute, 1989, Comparison of Privately and Publicly Operated Corrections Facilities in Kentucky and Massachusetts, Washington, D.C. 被引量:1
  • 10黄国金,陈卓达,陈杰.做51个俯卧撑后他再也没有起来[N].广州日报,2012-03-01(A13). 被引量:2

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部