摘要
目的比较研究AO锁骨钩钢板与传统方法治疗肩锁关节脱位与锁骨远端骨折,评估AO锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位与锁骨远端骨折的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析比较锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位及锁骨远端骨折12例与传统方法(克氏针张力带、钢丝环扎、螺钉固定等)治疗28例的治疗效果及并发症。结果40例经12～20个月随访,平均14个月。按照Lazzcano标准,两组治疗优良率分别为100%和78.6%。对两组疗效比较作χ2检验,P=0.025。锁骨钩钢板在治疗效果及并发症发生率上明显优于克氏针、钢丝环扎及螺钉固定等传统方法。结论AO锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位与锁骨远端骨折具有固定确实,不损伤关节面,可以早期功能锻炼等优点,值得推广。
Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of AO clavicular hook plates in treatment of dislocation of acromioclavicular joint and/or fracture of distal clavicle in comparison with traditional means. Methods A retrospective analysis was done to compare the outcomes and complications between the treatment of dislocation of acromioclavicular joint and/or the fracture of distal clavicle by AO clavicular hook plates and the treatment by conventional devices (e.g. Kirschner’s wire, wire-cerclage, bolt, et al). Results 40 cases were followed up for 12 to 20 months and the average time was 14 months. According to Lazzcano’s criterion, the rate of excellent and fine of the clinical outcomes of the 2 groups was 100%and 78.6%respectively. After statistical Chi-square test, P=0.025. Therapeutic outcomes and complications of the former were obviously better than the latter. Conclusion Since AO clavicular hook plates display advantages of rigid fixation, non-invasion into articular surface, and possibility of early functional exercise in the treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation and fractures of distal clavicle, they are worthy of recommending.
出处
《中华创伤骨科杂志》
CAS
CSCD
2004年第8期942-943,共2页
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
关键词
AO锁骨钩钢板
治疗
肩锁关节脱位
锁骨远端骨折
Clavicular hook plate
Dislocation of acromioclavicular joint
Clavicular fracture
