期刊文献+

陕西省城乡居民健康相关生命质量研究:基于EQ-5D量表效用值的测算 被引量:48

Analyzing the Health-related Quality of Life of Urban and Rural Residents in Shaanxi: Estimation Based on the EQ-5D Value Sets
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:测量陕西省城乡居民健康生命质量并分析其影响因素。方法:数据来源于陕西省第五次卫生服务调查,基于英国和我国的EQ-5D效应值积分体系计算EQ-5D健康效应值,采用Tobit回归模型分析健康效应值影响因素。结果:基于英国积分体系计算城乡居民健康效应值分别为0.945 6和0.935 2,基于中国积分体系计算的城乡居民健康效应值分别0.956 9和0.948 3。结论:陕西省城市居民的健康相关生命质量高于农村居民,居民经济水平、年龄、教育程度以及基本医疗保险参保情况等对健康相关生命质量有显著影响。 Objective:To estimate and analyze the urban and rural residents' health-related quality of life and its influence fac-tors in Shaanxi.Methods:The data came from the fifth National Health Service Survey in Shaanxi. The utility value of health statuswas calculated bRy using EQ-5D social value set from UK and China. The Tobit regression model was employed to analyze the factorsof utility value.esults:The urban and rural residents' utility values of health status were 0.945 6 and 0.935 2 respectively by us-ing social value set from UK and 0.956 9 and 0.948 3 respectively by using social set from China.Conclusion:Urban residents hadbetter health-related quality of life than rural residents in Shaanxi. Economic level, age, education degree and primary health insur-ance had significant influence on health-related quality of life.
出处 《中国卫生经济》 北大核心 2015年第2期13-16,共4页 Chinese Health Economics
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(08JZD0022) 美国中华医学基金会卫生政策与体系科学培养项目
关键词 健康相关生命质量 EQ-5D量表 健康效应值 TOBIT回归模型 陕西 health-related quality of life EQ-5D utility value of health status Tobit regression model Shaanxi
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献20

  • 1Torrance GW. Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life[J]. J Chronic Dis, 1987, 40(6) : 593-603. 被引量:1
  • 2Tsuchiya A, Ikeda S, Ikegami N, et al. Estimating an EQ-5D population value set : the case of Japan [ J ]. Health Econ, 2002, 11(4) : 341-353. 被引量:1
  • 3Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model [J]. Med Care, 2005, 43(3): 203-220. 被引量:1
  • 4Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states [J]. Med Care, 1997, 35 ( 11 ) : 1095-1108. 被引量:1
  • 5Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, et al. The time trade-off method : resuits from a general population study [J]. Health Econ, 1996, 5 (2) : 141-154. 被引量:1
  • 6Sakthong P, Charoenvisuthiwongs R, Shabunthom R. A comparison of EQ-SD index scores using the UK, US, and Japan preference weights in a Thai sample with type 2 diabetes [ J ]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2008, 6: 71. 被引量:1
  • 7Huang IC, Willke ILl, Atkinson M J, et al. US and UK versions of the EQ-5D preference weights: does choice of preference weights make a difference [J]. Qual Life Res, 2007, 16(6) : 1065-1072. 被引量:1
  • 8Brazier J, Roberts J, Tsuchiya A, et al. A comparison of the EQ- 5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups [J]. Health Econ, 2004, 13(9) : 873-884. 被引量:1
  • 9Johnson JA, Luo N, Shaw JW, et al. Valuations of EQ-5D health states: are the United States and United Kingdom different [ J].Med Care, 2005, 43(3) : 221-228,. 被引量:1
  • 10Luo N, Chew LH, Fong KY, et al. Do English and Chinese EQ5D versions demonstrate measurement equivalence? An exploratory study [ J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2003, 1 : 7. 被引量:1

共引文献47

同被引文献375

引证文献48

二级引证文献327

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部