摘要
明代传奇《天书记》是否真有初行及重订两个版本?两本的作者是否为同一人?这是长期困扰国内曲学界的两个问题。随着荷兰汉学家高罗佩藏海外孤本《天书记》的面世,第一个问题迎刃而解。作者在介绍初刻《天书记》版本信息并将其与重订本作比勘的基础上,尝试进一步探讨第二个问题,认为初行及重订《天书记》的作者分别为汪廷讷和陈所闻。
Does Tianshuji,a Ming dynasty legend,really have the primary edition and the revised edition?Is the author of these two versions the same person?These two questions have perplexed the academic circles for a long time.With the discovery of the primary version from the Dutch sinologist Robert van Gulik's collection,the first question is answered.The paper will investigate the information of the primary edition in detail,and compare the two versions of Tianshuji,and then try to identify the author of the revised edition.
出处
《上海师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第5期116-125,共10页
Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
基金
上海师范大学国家重点学科"比较文学与世界文学"
上海高校一流学科专项项目
上海市哲社项目"荷兰汉学家高罗佩研究"
上海市教委人文社科重点项目"高罗佩与中国文化"阶段性成果
关键词
高罗佩
孤本
天书记
初行本
重订本
Robert van Gulik,only existing copy,Tianshuji,the first version,the revised edition
