摘要
作为分析主义的马克思主义法学代表,柯林斯对马克思主义关于法律的不少论证进行了认真批判,其中关于"法律消亡论"的批判具有很大的代表性。然而,柯林斯自称采用的马克思主义分析方法却根本不是历史唯物主义,而更像是分析实证主义的一般方法,其虽然对于我们明晰马克思主义理论中的一些特定概念具有意义,但对马克思主义学说本身却多有误解。因为他无法完全从历史唯物主义的角度理解马克思主义关于"法律消亡"论述的实践意义和指向,于是只能从把马克思主义完全看作是乌托邦理想的角度展开其立论,不能辩证地看到,马克思主义关于"法律消亡"的预测并非目的本身,而是作为马克思主义者科学理解现实中的法律现象的一个视角。
As a legal representative for analytical Marxism,Collins carefully criticized many arguments of Marxism about the laws,in which the criticism on 'legal extinction' is representative.However,the analysis method for Marxism that Collins uses is not belong to the historical materialism, but rather like the general method to analysis positivism,it can help to understand some certain concepts of the Marxism theory,but it misunderstands the Marxism theory to some extent.He cannot completely understand the practical significance and guidance of the Marxism discourse on 'law extinction' from the perspective of historical materialism,thus his argument is based on the angle of regarding Marxism as the utopian ideal,he cannot dialectically recognize that the forecast of Marxism about 'legal extinction' is not the purpose,but is just a perspective for the Marxists to scientifically understand the legal phenomenon in reality.
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第11期150-153,160,共5页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
