期刊文献+

CSEA不同穿刺间隙在剖宫产手术中的应用效果 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较腰硬联合麻醉不同穿刺间隙在剖宫产术中的应用效果。方法:选取腰硬联合麻醉剖宫产产妇400例,随机分成A、B两组,各200例。两组都实施CSEA麻醉治疗,A组的穿刺间隙是L2-3,B组的穿刺点为L3-4间隙;穿刺成功后,在蛛网膜下腔注入适量的0.75%盐酸罗哌卡因。给药后用针刺法测定感觉阻滞平面,给药后一刻钟阻滞平面没有达到要求的患者,经硬膜外给予适量的2%利多卡因。麻醉期间要持续监测患者的血压、心率、脉搏、血氧饱和度及心电图,同时认真记录给药后一刻钟的脊麻平面、麻醉效果、并发症的发生率、婴儿1分钟与5分钟的Apgar评分。结果:一刻钟的脊庥平面,A组和B组间差异有显著性,两组间麻醉效果没有显著差异。与B组相比,A组低血压和恶心呕吐的发生率要高出很多。结论:在CSEA中采用L3-4间隙腰麻的腰硬联合麻醉的临床效果明显,不良反应极少。采用L3-4间隙腰麻不但可以得到满意的麻醉效果,还可以降低并发症发生率。
作者 李峥
出处 《求医问药(下半月)》 2013年第8期124-125,共2页 Seek Medical and Ask The Medicine
  • 相关文献

同被引文献34

  • 1Solangi SA, Siddiqui SM, Khaskheli MS, et al. Comparison of the effects of general vs. spinal anesthesia on neonatal outcome. Anaesth Intens Care, 2012, 16(1): 18-23. 被引量:1
  • 2Kolatat T, Somboonnanonda A, Lertakyamanee J, et al. Effects of general and regional anesthesia on the neonate (a prospective, rand- omized trial). J Med Assoc Thailand, 1999, 82(1): 40-45. 被引量:1
  • 3vanden Berg AA, Sadek M, Swanson S, et al. Epidural Injection of Lidocaine Reduces the Response to Dural Puncture Accompany- ing Spinal Needle Insertion When Performing Combined Spinal- Epidural Anesthesia. Anesth Analg, 2005, 101 (3): 882-885. 被引量:1
  • 4Rawal N, Holmstrom B, Crowhurst IA, et al. The combined spinal epidural technique. Anesthesiol Clin NA, 2000, 18(2): 267-295. 被引量:1
  • 5Ithnin F, Lim Y, Sia AT, et al. Combined Spinal Epidural Causes Higher Level of Block than Equivalent Single-Shot Spinal Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Patients. Anesth Analg, 2006, 102(2): 577-580. 被引量:1
  • 6Leo B, Sng BL, Lim Y, et al. A Randomized Comparison of Low Doses of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery. Anesth Analg, 2009, 109(5): 1600- 1605. 被引量:1
  • 7Higgins JPT, Green S. Assessing risk of bias in included studies: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of InterventionsS. 1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: www.cochrane- handbook.org. 被引量:1
  • 8Choi DH, Kim IA, Chung IS, et al. Comparison of combined spinal epidural anesthesia and epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. Acta Anaesth Scand, 2000, 44(2): 214-219. 被引量:1
  • 9Patel M, Craig M, Laishley R. A comparison between epidural an- aesthesia using alkalinized solution and spinal (combined spinal/ epidural) anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. Int JObs Anesth, 1996, 5(4): 236-239. 被引量:1
  • 10Rawal N, Schollin J, Wesstrom G. Epidural versus combined spinal epidural block for cesarean section. Acta Anaesth Scand, 1988, 32(1): 61-66. 被引量:1

引证文献3

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部