摘要
目的:比较光固化复合树脂或聚合瓷改良马里兰桥的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析在本院进行口腔美容修复的100例患者的临床资料,患者随机分成两组,观察组采用光固化复合树脂或聚合瓷改良马里兰桥进行口腔修复,对照组采用传统的合金材料进行修复,术后通过定期回访,比较两组患者的临床效果、并发症以及满意程度进行比较。结果:观察组患者的临床效果显著优于对照组,观察组并发症占总数的6.00%(3/50),与对照组的8.00%(4/50)的并发症率相比差异不显著(P>0.05),观察组患者满意率为96.00%(48/50)与对照组的80.00%(40/50)相比差异显著(P<0.05),差异具有统计学意义。结论:光固化复合树脂应用到口腔美容修复中能获得较高的满意率,其并发症发生情况与聚合瓷改良马里兰桥差异不显著,值得临床推广使用。
Objective:To compare the clinical effect of light-cured composite or the polymerization modified Mali lanqiao Porcelain. Methods:Retrospectively analyzing the clinical data of 100 patients of oral cosmetic repair. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. The observation group was treated with light-cured composite resin or porcelain polymerization modified Mali lanqiao porcelain, and the control group was treated with traditional alloy material. The follow-up visit was done regularly. The clinical effect, complications and satisfaction degree of two groups were compared. Results:Clinical effect of the observation group was superior to the control group significantly. In the observation group, the complication rate was 6.00% (3/50), and in the control group, that was 8.00% (4/50). There was significant difference (P>0.05). Satisfaction rate in the observation group was 96.00% (48/50) and in the control group, that was 80.00% (40/50). There was significant difference (P<0.05). The difference was statistically significant. Conclusion:Light-cured composite resin can obtain higher satisfaction, and its complications is no significant different with the traditional method, so it is worthy of clinical promotion.
出处
《中国医疗美容》
2014年第2期140-140,143,共2页
China Medical Cosmetology
关键词
光固化复合树脂
口腔美容
聚合瓷改良马里兰桥
light-cured composite
Oral cosmetic
polymerization modified Mali lanqiao porcelain
