期刊文献+

股价和性别对模拟选股决策的影响 被引量:1

THE EFFECT OF SHARE PRICE AND GENDER ON SIMULATED STOCK-SELECTING
下载PDF
导出
摘要 该模拟研究考察了股价和性别因素对股票新手选股决策的影响。股价为组内变量,分高低两个水平。被试是48名大学生,男女各半,均无股票操作经验。实验结果表明,股价对股票选择时间没有显著影响,但对被试体验到的冲突强度有明显影响,被试选择高价股时感受到的冲突强度显著高于选择低价股时感受到的冲突强度;在股票选择时间上存在显著的性别差异,女性选择时间明显长于男性的选择时间。 Simulated stock-selecting was adopted as the task to explore the effects of share price levels and gender on choice conflict resolutions. In this 2×2 study, share price levels (high vs. low) was a within-subjects variable, and gender (female vs. male) was a between-subjects variable. 48 undergraduates participated, including half females and half males without any experience for stock - selecting. The results showed: (1) There was no significant effect of share price levels on decision time, but a significant effect on the degree of conflict that subjects felt. The subjects felt much higher conflict when choosing from the stocks with higher share price; (2) There was a significant effect of gender on decision time. Females took much longer time than males.
作者 傅小兰 谭靖
出处 《心理与行为研究》 2003年第1期29-33,共5页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 国家自然科学基金30270466项目 中国科学院KJ952-J1-654项目 国家科技部G1998030508项目资助
关键词 选择冲突 股票选择 股价 性别 choice conflict, stock- selecting, share price level, gender.
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Birnbaum M H.Measurement, Judgment, and Decision Making. . 1998 被引量:1
  • 2Houston D A,Sherman S J.Preference judgments. The Encyclopedia of Human Behavior . 1994 被引量:1
  • 3Miller N.E.Experimental studies in conflict. Personality and the behavior disorders . 1944 被引量:1
  • 4Leon Festinger.A.Conflict,Decision,and Dissonance. . 1964 被引量:1
  • 5Houston D A,Doan K,Roskos-Ewoldsen D.Negative political advertising and choice conflict. Journal of Experiment . 1999 被引量:1
  • 6Rettinger D A,Hastie R.Content effects on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes . 2001 被引量:1
  • 7Houston DA,Sherman S J,Baker SM.Feature matching, unique features, and the dynamics of the choice process: Predecision conflict and postdecision satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology . 1991 被引量:1
  • 8Houston D A,Doan K A.Comparison of paired choice alternatives and choice conflict. Applied Cognitive Psychology . 1996 被引量:1
  • 9Houston D A,Roskos-Ewoldsen D R.The cancellation and focus model of choice and preferences for political candidates. Basic and Applied Social Psychology . 1998 被引量:1
  • 10Slovic P.Risk-taking in children: Age and sex differences. Child Development . 1966 被引量:1

同被引文献20

  • 1严进.多特征多选择决策任务的信息策略测量[J].心理科学,2002,25(5):618-619. 被引量:3
  • 2龙立荣,黄小华.大学生择业的社会生态模型:环境的力量[J].高等教育研究,2006,27(8):62-69. 被引量:32
  • 3周爱保,马小凤.大学生职业决策中的妥协策略[J].心理科学,2007,30(5):1247-1249. 被引量:17
  • 4Gati I & Asher I. The PIC model for career decision making: Prescreening, in-depth exploration and choice: From decision theory to career counseling practice. Career Development Quarterly, 2001, 50(2): 140-157. 被引量:1
  • 5Higgins E T. Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 1997, 52:1280-1300. 被引量:1
  • 6Herzenstein M, Posavac S S & Brakus J J. Adoption of new and really new products: The effects of self regulation systems and risk salience. Journal of Mar- keting Research, 2007, 44(2): 251-260. 被引量:1
  • 7Liu H H. Impact of regulatory focus on ambiguity aversion. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2011, 24:412-430. 被引量:1
  • 8Pham M T & Avnet T. Contingent reliance on the af- fect heuristic as a function of regulatory focus. Orga- nizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2009, 108(12): 267-278. 被引量:1
  • 9Rieskamp J & Hoffrage U. When do people use sim- ple heuristics and how can we tell? In G Gigerenzer, P Todd, & the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity Press, 1999. 被引量:1
  • 10Sassenberg K & Scholl A. The influence of regulatory focus on job-related values and job attraction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2012, 9:1-14. 被引量:1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部