期刊文献+

管理者超额薪酬与资本结构动态调整 被引量:23

Managerial Excess Compensation and Capital Structure Dynamic Adjustment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在最优契约假说和管理者权力假说的框架下,从资本结构调整速度和实际资本结构偏离目标资本结构程度两个方面,实证考察管理者超额薪酬对资本结构动态调整的影响。研究发现:管理者超额薪酬越高,资本结构调整速度越快;非国有上市公司的管理者超额薪酬越高,实际资本结构偏离目标资本结构的程度越低,但这一关系在国有上市公司并不成立,这可能是由于预算软约束等原因导致国有上市公司资本结构异化所引起。整体而言,管理者超额薪酬更多地反映了管理者能力的大小,领取高薪的管理者更有可能根据内外部环境的变化迅速调整公司的资本结构决策,表明最优契约假说仍然具有很强的适用性。 Based on optimal contracting approach and managerial power approach,this paper empirically exams influence of managerial excess compensation on capital structure adjustment from both aspect of capital structure adjustment speed and extent of actual capital structure biased from the target capital structure. Result shows that the higher the managerial excess compensation is,the quicker the capital structure adjusts. It also finds that the higher the managerial excess compensation is,the lower extent the actual capital structure biases from the target capital structure in the non state-owned enterprises. However,the relationship doesn’t exist in the state-owned enterprises,which may be caused by the dissimilatory capital structure due to soft budget constraint. Overall,the managerial excess compensation more likely indicates the ability of managers,and managers of high compensation adjust capital structure more quickly according to the environment of corporate. Optimal contracting approach suggests strong applicability.
出处 《财贸研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期148-156,共9页 Finance and Trade Research
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"管理防御 资本结构与公司业绩研究"(11BGL028) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目"管理防御与资本结构问题研究"(2011009511003)资助
关键词 最优契约假说 管理者权力假说 超额薪酬 资本结构 optimal contracting approach managerial power approach excess compensation capital structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Kevin J. Murphy.Corporate performance and managerial remuneration: An empirical analysisJournal of Accountancy,1985. 被引量:1
  • 2黄国良,罗旭东,施亭宇,孙佳.管理防御对上市公司资本结构的影响[J].商业研究,2010(5):53-58. 被引量:14
  • 3Jensen Michael C.Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeoversThe American Economist,1986. 被引量:9
  • 4ENGELBERG J,GAO P,PARSONS C A.The price of a CEO’’s rolodexReview of Finance,2013. 被引量:1
  • 5Ivan E. Brick,Oded Palmon,John K. Wald.CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: Evidence of cronyism?[J]Journal of Corporate Finance,2005(3). 被引量:1
  • 6Mark J. Flannery,Kasturi P. Rangan.Partial adjustment toward target capital structures[J]Journal of Financial Economics,2005(3). 被引量:2
  • 7Lucian Arye Bebchuk,Jesse M Fried,David I Walker.Managerial Power and Rent Extraction in the Design of Executive CompensationThe University of Chicago Law Review,2002. 被引量:1
  • 8Berger G,Ofek P E,Yermack D L.Managerial Entrenchment and Capital Structure DecisionThe Journal of Finance,1997. 被引量:1
  • 9Bebchuk,L.A;J.M.Fried.Executive compensation as an agency problem,2003. 被引量:3
  • 10Bernadette A.Minton.How Has CEO Turnover Changed?[J]Int Rev Finan,2012(1). 被引量:1

二级参考文献415

共引文献5557

同被引文献340

引证文献23

二级引证文献320

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部