摘要
1.对以民间传说与神话资料作为中国古代体育起源的依据提出了质疑,认为这种研究在把握资料上缺乏理性分析,这些资料只能作为传说来看待。2.对中国体育史学家提出的人类原始的体育活动方式可以追溯到5万年到10万年甚至50万年以前提出不同意见。认为岩画不能作为中国古代体育最早的考古学证据,考古学家几乎没有发现任何证据证明史前时代的中国有体育存在。3.甲骨文不能作为体育史学提供证据,它所提供的一些活动不具备竞技的特点,不能纳入体育或竞技格斗的范畴。从考古学的观点来看,真正的体育只能追溯到后周时代。
1. The author questioned basing the origin of Chinese ancient sports on folklores and mythologies,and believed this kind of researches lack rational analysis because the materials they used may only be regarded as folklores. 2. The author disagreed with Chinese sports historians who put forward that human being's primitive sports activities could trace back to 50,000 or even 500,000 years ago, who thought rock painting couldn't be taken as the earliest archaeological evidence of Chinese ancient sports and archaeologists had found few evidence to prove that sports exist in China in prehistorie times. 3. Inscriptiens on bones or tortoise shells couldn't be regarded as sports historiography for activities they provided had no sports characters, thus couldn't be brought into catagory of sports or atheletic grapple. Viewing from archaeology, real sports can only trace back to the Later Zhou Dynasty.
出处
《山东体育学院学报》
1997年第2期1-5,共5页
Journal of Shandong Sport University
关键词
中国古代体育
起源
考古学
神话与传说
岩画
甲骨文
古文献
Chinese ancient sports,origin,archaeology,mythology and folklore, rock painting, Inscriptions on bones or tortoise shells, ancient documents
