期刊文献+

国家抗微生物治疗指南的价值、特点与应用 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 按照世界卫生组织(WHO)定义:指南(guide或guideline)是指有助于医生或处方者对特定临床情况确定恰当医疗保健决定的系统性规定。作为指南至少包括对特定临床情况的特征、诊断、治疗(药物与非药物治疗)的描述;指南一般只是对医师提供参考,不是强制性法规,对患者的最终处理决定还应该由医师自行决定;指南的价值主要因医师的专业水平而定,指南只是在纯粹个人经验和基于科学数据的循证医疗之间设定基本界限,避免因医师个人经验缺失或错误导致不正确处置,也需要避免过于机械依赖指南而忽视临床的个体差异。由此可见,指南对于非专科医师和临床普遍存在的问题具有较为重要的价值,感染的诊断与处置即属于这类问题[1,2]。
作者 肖永红
出处 《中国医学前沿杂志(电子版)》 2013年第8期17-24,共8页 Chinese Journal of the Frontiers of Medical Science(Electronic Version)
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献14

  • 1Mulrow CD. Rationale for systematic reviews [J]. BMJ, 1994, 309(6954) :597-599. 被引量:1
  • 2NHMRC additional levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines [EB/OL].(Astralian)National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). 2006. 被引量:1
  • 3Shekelle PG, Schriger DL. Evaluating the use of the appropriateness method in the agency for health care policy and research clinical practice guideline development process [J]. Health Serv Res, 1996,31 (4) : 453-468. 被引量:1
  • 4Sanders GD, Nease RF Jr, Owens DK. Publishing web-based guidelines using interactive decision models [J]. J Eval Clin Pract, 2001,7(2) : 175-189. 被引量:1
  • 5Paul GS, Steven HW, Martin E, et al. Clinical guidelines: Developing guidelines [ J ]. BMJ, 1999,318 (7183 ) : 593-596. 被引量:1
  • 6National Health and Medical Research Council. A guide to the developmcnt,implementation and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines[EB/OL]. (Astralian)National Health and Medical Research Council(NHMRC). 1999. 被引量:1
  • 7Burgers JS, Fervers B, Haugh M, et al. International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oneology using the appraisal of guidelines and research and evaluation instrument [J]. J Clin Oneol, 2004,22 (10) : 2000- 2007. 被引量:1
  • 8Rycroft-Malone J. Formal consensus: The development of a national clinical guideline [J]. Quality in Health Care, 2001, 10:238-244. 被引量:1
  • 9Dickersin K, Berlin JA. Meta-analysis: State-of-science (review) [J]. Epidemiol Rev , 1992, 14: 154-176. 被引量:1
  • 10Washington DL, Bernstein SJ, Kahan JP, et al. Reliability of clinical guideline development using mail-only versus in-person expert panels [J]. Med Care, 2003,41 (12) : 1374-1381. 被引量:1

共引文献202

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部