摘要
在经济思想发展史上,资本理论一直是经济学理论争论的核心领域。不论是强调社会关系的古典学派和马克思经济学、还是专注于技术关系的主流新古典经济学,都对这一核心理论提出了不同观点。通过对两种分析传统、尤其是马克思经济学对资本概念及资本理论争论的简单回顾,本文认为新古典理论一系列逻辑悖论产生的原因,正是在于其完全回避了特定资本主义制度及其经济关系所致;相反,古典和马克思经济学强调了现实资本主义经济体系中以预付资本概念所代表的资本与劳动相对立的资本主义经济关系的本质,从而认为科学借鉴马克思的资本理论完全可以用于指导我国当前的社会主义市场经济体制建设。
In the history of economic thoughts,capital theory is always the core field in the debates of economic theories.No matter what is the classical school and Marxian economics which focused on social relations,or the neoclassical economics which emphasized technological relations,all of them posed different views on this theory.Through retrospection on the concept of capitals and the capital theories analyzed by two traditions and Marxian economics,this paper holds that,the reason of logic paradoxes in the neoclassical theory is that it avoided the special capitalist system and its economic relations.On the contrary,it was based on capitalist relations that the capital theory of Marxian economics expounded the content of advanced monetary capitals,the capital essence of capitalist relations,and the capital nature of capitalist accumulation and competition,which announced the real capitalist economic relations and its operation law.Obviously,it has profound significance for directing the construction of socialist market economy system in our country.
出处
《政治经济学评论》
2005年第2期183-207,共25页
China Review of Political Economy
