期刊文献+

我国基金会内部治理机制有效吗? 被引量:25

Is Internal Governance of Foundations in China Effective?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以全国性基金会为研究样本,对理事会规模、监事会规模、负责人政治联系、理事会会议次数等内部治理特征与基金会绩效之间的关联性进行研究。研究发现:理事会规模越大越能显著提高基金会业务活动绩效、管理绩效和筹资绩效,理事会作为基金会内部治理机制之一能够较好地发挥效应;但作为基金会内部监督主体的监事会,其规模与较高的基金会绩效不显著相关,其治理职能面临弱化的窘境;负责人政治联系、理事会会议次数等内部治理特征与较高的基金会绩效并不显著相关。为此建议让社会公众代表进入监事会,来提高监事会的独立性、志愿性和专业性;由主要捐赠者亲自委派监事,强化监督动机,降低代理成本。 By using samples of national foundations,we analyze the relationship between internal governance characteristics and foundation effectiveness.Empirical studies find that large board can enhance the program effectiveness,managerial effectiveness and fundraising effectiveness significantly.We also find the size of supervision committee is irrelative to foundation effectiveness,facing weakened governance function dilemma.Meanwhile,political relationship of leaders,number of board meetings do not support our hypotheses,these internal governance characteristics are not related to foundation effectiveness.Supervision committee is the main governance body of foundations.In order to improve its governance effectiveness,we advise that public representatives enter supervision committee,or supervision committee members should be appointed by main donators.We hope our research will give implications and suggestions for the improvement of nonprofit organization governance.
作者 张立民 李晗
出处 《审计与经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期79-88,共10页 Journal of Audit & Economics
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(10YJCZH113)
关键词 非营利组织 基金会管理 内部治理机制 绩效管理 理事会规模 监事会规模 nonprofit organization foundation management internal governance of foundation system performance control size of board of administration size of board of supervisors
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1刘永泽,唐大鹏.社保基金持股信息的市场反应——基于中国资本市场数据[J].审计与经济研究,2011,26(5):3-13. 被引量:22
  • 2Callen,J.L.,Falk,H.Agency and Efficiency in Nonprofit Organizations: The Case of “Specific Health Focus” CharitiesThe Accounting Review,1993. 被引量:1
  • 3Callen J L,Klein A,Tinkelman D.Board composition,committees,and organizational efficiency:the case of nonprofitsNonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,2011. 被引量:1
  • 4Pablo A A,Natalia M C,Elena M R.The governance of nonprofit organizations:empirical evidence from nongovernmentaldevelopment organizations in SpainNonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,2011. 被引量:1
  • 5Posnett, J.,Sandler, T.Demand for charity donations in private non-profit markets: the case of the UKJournal of Public Economics,1989. 被引量:1
  • 6Conger,J.,Finegold,D.,Lawler,E.Appraising Boardroom PerformanceHarvard Business,1998. 被引量:1
  • 7Johnson,S,Mitton,T.Cronyism and Capital Controls:Evidence from MalaysiaThe Journal of Finance,2003. 被引量:2
  • 8Li Hongbin,Lingsheng Meng,Qian Wang,Li-An Zhou.Political Connections and Firm Performance:Evidence from Chinese Private FirmsCIG Working Paper Series -CIG,2005. 被引量:1
  • 9Faccio M,Parsley D.Sudden Death:Taking Stock of Political Connections,2006. 被引量:1
  • 10Khwaja, A,A. Mian.Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial marketQuantitative Journal of Economics,2004. 被引量:1

二级参考文献16

  • 1高鸿桢,林嘉永.信息不对称资本市场的实验研究[J].经济研究,2005,40(2):63-71. 被引量:38
  • 2吴敬琏.十年纷纭话股市[M].上海:上海远东出版社.2001. 被引量:6
  • 3Fama E F. Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work[J]. Journal of Finance, 1970, 25 (2): 383 - 417. 被引量:1
  • 4Brennan M J. Shareholder preferences and dividend policy[ J]. The Journal of Finance, 1990(45) : 993 - 1018. 被引量:1
  • 5De L, Shleifer J B, Summers L H, et al. Noise trader risk in financial markets [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990 (98) : 703 - 738. 被引量:1
  • 6De L. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets : a review of the empirical disclosure literature [ J ]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1990 ( 31 ) :405 - 440. 被引量:1
  • 7Barberis N, Shleifer A, Vishny R A model of investor sentiment [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1998 ( 49 ) : 307 - 343. 被引量:1
  • 8Bloomfield B. The incomplete revelation hypothesis and financial reporting [ J ]. Accounting Horizons, 2002 (16): 233 - 243. 被引量:1
  • 9Cho J, Jo K. Overconfidence and information:the differences between individuals and institutions [ J ]. Seoul National Uni- versity. 2006 (7) : 33 - 40. 被引量:1
  • 10Bartov E, Radhakrishnan S, Krinsky I. Investor sophistication and patterns in stock returns after earnings announcements [ J ]. The Accounting Review,2000 (75) : 43 - 63. 被引量:1

共引文献24

同被引文献303

引证文献25

二级引证文献90

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部