摘要
犯罪构成是刑法理论的核心,也是刑法学科中举足轻重的基本范畴。近年来随着对国外犯罪构成理论的研究,许多学者提出我国犯罪构成理论存在缺陷并对其进行批判分析,提出改造与重构方案。与此同时也有学者提出我国犯罪构成理论的合理性和改造的不必要性的观点,对我国的犯罪构成理论进行了维护与坚持。通过对我国的犯罪构成理论体系和外国的犯罪构成理论体系进行比较研究,可以较为全面地透视中外犯罪构成理论体系的异同,从而为我们正确地认识中外犯罪构成理论体系的内在价值提供重要的参考。
Constitution of crime is not only the core of criminal law theory,but also important category of basic criminal law subjects.In recent years,with the theoretical study of the theory constitution abroad,many scholars put forward flawed of our constitution crime theory and a critical analysis of its,proposed renovation and reconstruction programs; At the same time,some scholars put forward the view that the theory of Crime is reasonable and rebuilding it is not need,constitute crimes against our theory of the maintenance and persistence.Based on a comparative study between the theoretical system of our Crime and Crime Theory of Civil Law system,a more comprehensive perspective of the theoretical system of Chinese and foreign Crime similarities and differences,so for us to correctly understand the intrinsic value of theoretical system of Chinese and foreign crime constitutes have an important referencing value.
出处
《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》
2010年第6期41-45,共5页
Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
关键词
犯罪构成
理论体系
比较研究
Constitution of crime
Theory system
Comparative study
