摘要
许多学者主张 ,我国应以效果原则为依据 ,建立反垄断法的域外适用制度。但美国反垄断法的历史表明 ,效果原则有许多弊端。美、德、欧洲法院、欧共体委员会的实践表明 ,需要采用多种方法对效果原则进行限制 ,并应借鉴冲突法的方法 ,尽可能采用能体现真实联系的连结因素 ,而以效果原则作为补充 ,从而避免单纯的效果原则所产生的扩大本国反垄断法适用的倾向。
Many scholars advocate that we should establish the system of the extraterritorial application of anti-trust law on the basis of ‘rule of effect', which has been proved to have much disadvantages by the experience of America. A comparative study on the relevant practices of America, Germany, EU Committee and Court of Justice shows that the application of this rule should be restricted, and it is a better choice to adopt connecting factors to justify the application of domestic anti-law on real connections between the case and the law applied, and supplemented by rule of effect where no such factor is found. This combination helps to limit such extraterritorial application to a reasonable extent.
出处
《时代法学》
2004年第3期99-107,共9页
Presentday Law Science
关键词
垄断
反垄断法
竞争法
域外适用
monopoly
anti-trust law
competitive law
extraterritorial application
