摘要
目的比较可达龙与利多卡因对室性心动过速患者的临床疗效。方法室性心动过速患者86例,随机分为可达龙组44例与利多卡因组42例,比较2组疗效、副作用的发生率、1周内及随访半年的终点事件发生率。2组入选患者均持续心电监护1周。结果疗效:可达龙组与利多卡因组有效率分别为81.6%,83%,2组疗效比较差异无统计学意义;副作用发生率分别为4.5%,7.1%,差异无统计学意义;短期终点事件发生率分别为6.8%,26.2%,差异有统计学意义。结论可达龙与利多卡因对室性心动过速均有显著疗效,2组副作用发生率无显著差异,短期病死率利多卡因组高于可达龙组。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of amiodarone and lidocaine on ventricular arrhythmias.Methods 86 patients were randomized to two groups. Among them,44 patients were treated with amiodarone and 42 patients were treated with lidocaine. Then curative effects,adverse effects and several months later prognosis were observed during the therapeutic procedure.Results both amiodarone and lidocaine have effects on ventricular arrhythmias there was no significant difference between two groups,and so incidence of adverse effects. the several months later mortality in lidocaine group was higher than that in amiodarone group.Conclusion Amiodarone and lidocainecan quickly and efficiently cure ventricular arrhythmias. But the several months later mortality lidocaine group was higher than that in amiodarone group.
出处
《基层医学论坛》
2009年第16期499-500,共2页
The Medical Forum
