摘要
目的:探讨不同随访方式对接受冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者预后的影响。方法:将已行PCI的358例冠心病患者,随机分为对照组和观察组。观察组除了给予常规的出院医嘱之外,医生主动为患者安排复诊时间及复诊内容,并监督完成;对照组则仅给予患者出院医嘱,由患者自己安排复诊,医生被动接受患者复诊。一年后随访,观察两组患者的吸烟、体重及血压、血脂、血糖的控制情况,并统计主要不良心血管事件(包括再发急性冠脉综合征、血管重建、与心脏有关的猝死)的发生率。结果:与对照组比较,观察组吸烟、体重、血脂、血压、血糖控制好(P<0.01),发生主要不良心血管事件明显减少(P<0.01)。结论:随访方式改变有利于PCI治疗后冠心病患者的心血管危险因素的控制,明显降低了主要不良心血管事件。建议随访模式转变为医生主动为患者服务,及早发现问题,早期处理。
Objective:To compare the effects of different modes of follow-up on patients of received primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).Methods:A total of 358 consecutive patients received primary PCI were randomly divided into observation group and control group.The patients of observation group received positive mode of follow-up and were arranged for their time and content of return visit by their doctors.But the patients of control group received theconventional passive mode of follow-up and chose thei...
出处
《陕西医学杂志》
CAS
北大核心
2008年第12期1617-1619,共3页
Shaanxi Medical Journal
