期刊文献+

证据特征提取及其在证据理论改进中的应用 被引量:19

Feature Extraction of Evidence and Its Application in Modification of Evidence Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 尽管DS证据理论可以有效地处理不确定性信息,但是在证据高度冲突情况下,经典DS证据组合规则因归一化过程往往会产生有悖常理的融合结果.为此,很多学者提出了许多不同的修改方法,可以归为两类:修改组合规则和修改证据.在总结这两类修改思路的基础上,分析了几种代表性的改进方法,同时通过引入证据距离,对证据源进行特征提取,提出了相应的改进方案.理论分析和数值实验结果表明,改进后的3种方法不仅能充分体现相应的改进思想,而且可以更好地实现证据组合,较快地收敛真实目标,得到合理的融合结果. The classical DS evidence theory involves counter-intuitive behaviours when the high conflict information exists. On the base of the two modification ideas, the modification of combination rules and the modification of evidence sources,this paper analyzed some typical existing modification methods and proposed to extract the intrinsic characteristics of the existing evidence sources by using evidence distance theory. With the application of the extracted feature, three modification methods were proposed. From the results of the numerical examples, the three proposed methods can not only realize the modification ideas, but also provide reasonable results with good convergence efficiency.
出处 《上海交通大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第z1期164-168,共5页 Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University
基金 国防重点实验室基金资助项目(51476040103JW13)
关键词 证据理论 组合规则 权重 特征提取 证据距离 evidence theory combination rule weighting factor feature extraction evidence distance
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[1]Shafer G. The Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence [M]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,1976. 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Beynon M, Curry B, Morgan P. The DempsterShafer theory of evidence: an alternative approach to multicriteria decision modeling [J]. Omega, 2000,28: 37- 50. 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Zadeh L. A simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination[J]. AI Magazine, 1986, 7: 85-90. 被引量:1
  • 4[4]Yager R. On the dempster shafer framework and new combination rules [ J ]. Information Sciences,1987, 41:93-137. 被引量:1
  • 5[5]Dubois D, Prade H. Representation and combination of uncertainty with belief functions and possibility measures [J]. Computational Intelligence, 1998, 4:244-264. 被引量:1
  • 6[6]Murphy C. Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2000,29: 1-9. 被引量:1
  • 7[9]Haenni R. Are alternatives to Dempster's rule of combination real alternatives? Comments on "About the belief function combination and the conflict management problem"-Lefevre et al [J]. Information Fusion, 2002, 3:237-239. 被引量:1
  • 8[10]Jousselme A, Grenier D, Bosse E. A new distance between two bodies of evidence[J]. Information Fusion, 2001, 2 : 91- 101. 被引量:1

同被引文献209

引证文献19

二级引证文献129

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部