期刊文献+

高压氧治疗时机对颅脑损伤临床疗效影响的分析 被引量:2

Analyse the Influence of HBO Treatment Opportunity on Craniocerebrai Injury Clinical Effectiveness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨颅脑损伤后,行高压氧治疗效果的最佳时机。方法对颅脑损伤的病人在常规治疗同时进行高压氧治疗,并 根据伤后行高压氧治疗的时间,伤后7-15天,16-30天,1月以上,将病人分为高压氧治疗1组,治疗2组,治疗3组,并将3组治疗效果进行对照分析。结果治疗1组愈显率为94.34%,治疗2组为70.18%,治疗3组为58.62%。有显著差开(P<0. 01)。总有效率治疗1组为98.11%,治疗2组为91.23%,治疗3组为75.86%。(P<0.01)。结论高压氧治疗时机是影响疗 效的关键。 Objectire:TO study the best opportunity of HBO treatment effect after craniocerebral injury.Method:Patients of craniocerebral injury are carried on HBO treatment while the routine is used.According to different time,7-15days,16-30 days and beyond one month after injury,the patients are divided into three groups (Group 1,Group 2,Group 3) to receive HBO treatment.The treatment effect of three groups are compared and analyzed.Result: Group i's efficiency rate is 94.34%,Group 2's is 70.18%,and Group 3's is 58.62%.There are remarkable difference (P<0.01).The total cure rate of Group I is 98.11%,Goupe2 is91.23%,Goupe3 is 75.86%.There are remarkable difference too ( P <0.01).Conclusion: The HBO treatment opportunity is the key to achieve curative effect.
出处 《川北医学院学报》 CAS 2004年第4期176-178,共3页 Journal of North Sichuan Medical College
关键词 颅脑损伤 高压氧治疗 治疗时机 craniocerebrai injury,HBO treatment,treatment opportunity
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1史玉泉.脑血管性肿瘤.实用神经病学[M].上海:科学技术出版社,1994.557-562. 被引量:8
  • 2[2]肖平田.治疗时机决定高压氧疗效[N].健康报,2003-07-09,(7). 被引量:1

共引文献7

同被引文献15

  • 1张逵,陈联盟,胡红,史成华.高压氧对重型颅脑外伤并发症和后遗症的治疗[J].川北医学院学报,1994,9(4):51-52. 被引量:1
  • 2Hirn M.Hyperbaric oxygen in the treatment of gas gangrene and perineal necrotizing fasciitis.A clinical and experimental study.European Journal of Surgery-Supplements.1993,(570):31-36. 被引量:1
  • 3Hartl R, Gerber LM, Iacono L, et al. Direct transport within an or- ganized state trauma system reduces mortality in patients with server traumatic brain injury[ J]. J Trauma, 2006, 60(6) : 1250 -1256. 被引量:1
  • 4Carrear E, Schmidt JM, Fermandez I, et al. Spontaneous hyperventila- tion and brain tissue hypoxia in patients with severe brain injury[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2010, 81(7) : 793 -797. 被引量:1
  • 5Vadeboncecnr TF, Davis DP, Ochs M, et al. The ability of paramed- icstio predict aspirationin patients undergoing prehespital rapid se- quence intubation[ J]. J Emergency Med, 2006, 30(2) : 131 -136. 被引量:1
  • 6Hsu CL, Chen KY, Chang CH, et al. Timing of tracheostomy as a determinant of weaning success in critically ill patients: a retrospective study[J]. Critical Care, 2005, 9(1) : R46 -R52. 被引量:1
  • 7Kluge S, Baumalan H J, Mailer C, et al. Tracheostomy in the Inten- sive Care Unit: A Nationwide Survey[ J]. Anesth Analg, 2008, 107 (5):1639 - 1643. 被引量:1
  • 8Day MW. Transport of the Critically ill : the northwest med star experi- ence[J]. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am,2005,17(2) :183 -190. 被引量:1
  • 9Lezoche E, Felioiotti F, Paganini AM, et al. Lapavosopic vs open hemieolectomy for colon cancer [ J ]. Sury Eendosc, 2002, 16 (4) : 596 - 602. 被引量:1
  • 10甘泉,苏满仓,俞燕生,王遵海,左治强,姜宏田,顾大群.高压氧综合治疗37例颅脑损伤患者疗效探讨[J].中国实用医药,2008,3(10):129-129. 被引量:1

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部