摘要
面对黄勇连环杀人案,我们更多的是指责政府信息不公开和公安机关"不破不立"的现状,却很少探寻公安机关"明知故犯"背后的真正隐情,即"命案必破"所带来的弊病。事实上,尽管"命案必破"的初衷是为有效打击严重的刑事犯罪,使人民群众满意,但在社会资源有限的情况下,以牺牲其他"小案件"的侦破时机和资源为代价,并不能换得人们对社会治安状况的认同;尽管该工作目标的制定,本是种勇气可嘉的创新,但在实践中却越来越突显其强行使应然状态与实然状态一致的不科学性,而由此带给公安机关的过大压力,又潜在地滋长着"不破不立"与"刑讯逼供"的积习。黄勇案的发生,警醒我们在放弃对"命案必破"盲目尊崇的同时,也应反思长期以来其血肉相连的侦查价值观念和法律文化。
When the murder of Huang Yong occurred, the relative government and the police bureau did not make the truth known to the public in time and take further protective measures. Thus people only strongly criticized these actions, while neglecting to denounce the slogan on setting a deadline for investigating homicide. But it should be seen that this slogan does not satisfy the people's sense of security for person and property, which is not in accordance with its initial aim. In addition, some unlawful long-standing practice, such as torture in criminal procedure and placing a criminal case on file unless it is solved in judicial, is encouraged, for the policemen are under the unendurable pressure brought from this unscientific slogan which forces intrinsic state upon realistic state. Furthermore, the murder of Huang Yong not only makes us abandon the blind obedience to the slogan on setting a deadline for investigating homicide but also warns us to reconsider our traditional ideal of investigation and legal culture.
出处
《湖南公安高等专科学校学报》
2004年第4期17-23,共7页
Journal of Huan Public Security College
关键词
命案必破
不破不立
刑讯逼供
侦查理念
setting a deadline for investigating homicide, no registering until finishing investigation, torture in criminal procedure, investigation system
